Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam H35-660_V2.0 Topic 1 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-660_V2.0 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 1
[All H35-660_V2.0 Questions]

What is the IoV scenario for realizing vehicle-to-network communication? (single-choice question, 2 points)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Question Analysis: Vehicle and Road (V2I): Vehicle-mounted equipment communicates with roadside infrastructure (such as traffic lights, traffic cameras, roadside units, etc.); Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V): Vehicle-to-vehicle communication through vehicle-mounted terminals; People (V2P): Vulnerable traffic groups (such as pedestrians, cyclists, etc.) use user equipment (such as mobile phones, laptops, etc.) to communicate with in-vehicle devices; Vehicle and Network (V2N): In-vehicle devices communicate with in-vehicle devices through the access network/core network. Cloud platform connection.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Caitlin
3 months ago
I heard they're working on a new option called V2Z - vehicle-to-Zombie. Now that's a scenario I'd like to see!
upvoted 0 times
Katie
2 months ago
I agree, V2I seems like the most important scenario for vehicle-to-network communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
2 months ago
That would be interesting to see, but I think V2I is more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaitlyn
3 months ago
V2N, because why settle for a dumb car when you can have a smart one that's always online?
upvoted 0 times
Heike
3 months ago
I think V2I is important too for communication with infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
3 months ago
I agree, V2N is the way to go for constant connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanda
3 months ago
V2V is the future, baby! Imagine all the cars chatting with each other, like a party on wheels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
3 months ago
V2P, all the way! Gotta look out for those pedestrians, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Omer
3 months ago
D) V2N
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
3 months ago
C) V2P
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
3 months ago
B) V2V
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
3 months ago
A) V2I
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margot
4 months ago
Definitely V2I. Communicating with the infrastructure just seems more practical for real-world scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
Celeste
3 months ago
V2I is definitely the way to go for reliable communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
3 months ago
I think V2V could also be useful in certain situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
3 months ago
I agree, V2I makes more sense for vehicle-to-network communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myra
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) V2V because it involves communication between vehicles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
4 months ago
V2N seems like the way to go. I mean, who doesn't want their car to be as connected as their smartphone?
upvoted 0 times
Roxane
3 months ago
I think V2I is also important for connecting vehicles to infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
3 months ago
I agree, V2N is definitely the future of vehicle communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
3 months ago
I agree, V2N is definitely the future of vehicle communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
3 months ago
D) V2N
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
3 months ago
C) V2P
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
3 months ago
B) V2V
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
3 months ago
A) V2I
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) V2I.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77