Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPP-US Topic 2 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-US exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 2
[All CIPP-US Questions]

SuperMart is a large Nevada-based business that has recently determined it sells what constitutes ''covered information'' under Nevada's privacy law, Senate Bill 260. Which of the following privacy compliance steps would best help SuperMart comply with the law?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Queen
5 months ago
I think both options A and B are necessary for SuperMart to comply with the law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
5 months ago
Haha, I bet SuperMart wishes they could just opt-out of this whole privacy law thing. Option A sounds nice and easy, but I doubt that's going to cut it.
upvoted 0 times
Ming
3 months ago
Reviewing vendor contracts is crucial too, can't overlook that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
4 months ago
I agree. Implementing internal protocols sounds more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
4 months ago
Yeah, opting out seems too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
4 months ago
D) Reviewing its vendor contracts to ensure that the vendors are subject to service provider restrictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
4 months ago
B) Implementing internal protocols for handling access and deletion requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
4 months ago
A) Providing a mechanism for consumers to opt out of sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ming
5 months ago
I believe option B) Implementing internal protocols for handling access and deletion requests is also important for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
5 months ago
I agree with France, giving consumers the choice to opt out is crucial for privacy compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
5 months ago
Option C is interesting, but I don't think a notice of financial incentive is the most important thing here. The law is about protecting consumer data, not loyalty programs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D also seems like a good idea, making sure the vendors are subject to the right restrictions.
upvoted 0 times
Callie
4 months ago
D) Reviewing its vendor contracts to ensure that the vendors are subject to service provider restrictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
5 months ago
A) Providing a mechanism for consumers to opt out of sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
5 months ago
I think option A) Providing a mechanism for consumers to opt out of sales would be the best step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
5 months ago
I agree with Glynda, option B seems like the most comprehensive and effective solution to address SuperMart's compliance needs.
upvoted 0 times
Shawana
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to have protocols in place for handling customer requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
4 months ago
I think option B is a good choice. It covers access and deletion requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
4 months ago
Yeah, I think a combination of options B and D would cover all the bases for SuperMart's compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
4 months ago
Option B seems like a good starting point to handle access and deletion requests internally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
5 months ago
I agree, but I think option D is crucial to make sure vendors are also following the law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
5 months ago
I think option A could also be important for giving consumers control over their information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glynda
5 months ago
I think option B is the best choice here. Implementing internal protocols for handling access and deletion requests is a critical step for complying with Nevada's privacy law.
upvoted 0 times
Jacki
5 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
5 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77