IAPP Exam CIPP-US Topic 4 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-US exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 4

[All CIPP-US Questions]

What was unique about the action that the Federal Trade Commission took against B.J.'s Wholesale Club in 2005?

AIt made third-party audits a penalty for policy violations.

BIt was based on matters of fairness rather than deception.

CIt was the first substantial U.S.-EU Safe Harbor enforcement.

DIt made user consent mandatory after any revisions of policy.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Per the FTC Press Release in 2005, 'BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc. has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that its failure to take appropriate security measures to protect the sensitive information of thousands of its customers was an unfair practice that violated federal law.'

by Bernadine at Sep 15, 2024, 10:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP-US Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Clay

2 months ago

I'm just going to roll the dice on this one. Eenie, meenie, miney, moe... C it is! Though I hear the FTC has a real soft spot for wholesale clubs.

upvoted 0 times

Danica

12 days ago

B) It was based on matters of fairness rather than deception.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miles

17 days ago

A) It made third-party audits a penalty for policy violations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Henriette

25 days ago

C) It was the first substantial U.S.-EU Safe Harbor enforcement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristy

2 months ago

C is the way to go, folks. The FTC's action against B.J.'s was the first substantial enforcement under the Safe Harbor agreement. Easy peasy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

2 months ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm going to guess D - the FTC made user consent mandatory after any revisions of policy. Sounds like something they would do.

upvoted 0 times

Wai

25 days ago

I remember reading about this, it was actually C - the first substantial U.S.-EU Safe Harbor enforcement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

1 months ago

I'm not sure about that, I believe it was B - based on matters of fairness rather than deception.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maddie

1 months ago

I think it was actually A - it made third-party audits a penalty for policy violations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

2 months ago

The question is a bit tricky, but I'm going with B. The FTC's action was based on matters of fairness rather than deception.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

2 months ago

I think the answer is C. The FTC's action against B.J.'s Wholesale Club in 2005 was the first substantial enforcement under the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor framework.

upvoted 0 times