Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPT Topic 3 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPT exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 3
[All CIPT Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Chuck, a compliance auditor for a consulting firm focusing on healthcare clients, was required to travel to the client's office to perform an onsite review of the client's operations. He rented a car from Finley Motors upon arrival at the airport as so he could commute to and from the client's office. The car rental agreement was electronically signed by Chuck and included his name, address, driver's license, make/model of the car, billing rate, and additional details describing the rental transaction. On the second night, Chuck was caught by a red light camera not stopping at an intersection on his way to dinner. Chuck returned the car back to the car rental agency at the end week without mentioning the infraction and Finley Motors emailed a copy of the final receipt to the address on file.

Local law enforcement later reviewed the red light camera footage. As Finley Motors is the registered owner of the car, a notice was sent to them indicating the infraction and fine incurred. This notice included the license plate number, occurrence date and time, a photograph of the driver, and a web portal link to a video clip of the violation for further review. Finley Motors, however, was not responsible for the violation as they were not driving the car at the time and transferred the incident to AMP Payment Resources for further review. AMP Payment Resources identified Chuck as the driver based on the rental agreement he signed when picking up the car and then contacted Chuck directly through a written letter regarding the infraction to collect the fine.

After reviewing the incident through the AMP Payment Resources' web portal, Chuck paid the fine using his personal credit card. Two weeks later, Finley Motors sent Chuck an email promotion offering 10% off a future rental.

What should Finley Motors have done to incorporate the transparency principle of Privacy by Design (PbD)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

referential integrity does not contribute to keeping the data confidential.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Phyliss
3 days ago
I think obtaining verbal consent from Chuck and recording it within internal systems would have been a better approach to incorporate the transparency principle of Privacy by Design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
5 days ago
Hmm, I think D is the correct answer here. The rental agreement should have provided clear notice to Chuck about Finley Motors' data sharing practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
8 days ago
I agree with Kaycee. It would have been more transparent if Chuck was informed about the data sharing practices upfront.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
10 days ago
I think Finley Motors should have provided notice of data sharing practices within the electronically signed rental agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77