Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPT Topic 7 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPT exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 7
[All CIPT Questions]

An organization is evaluating a number of Machine Learning (ML) solutions to help automate a customer-facing part of its business From a privacy perspective, the organization should first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

An organization launching a new smart speaker to the market that has the capability to play music and provide news and weather updates would have concerns about context aware computing rather than browser fingerprinting from a privacy perspective. Context aware computing involves using information about an individual's location or behavior to tailor their experience with technology. This can raise concerns about how personal data is collected and used without individuals' knowledge or consent.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Stefania
1 months ago
As an AI enthusiast, I'm tempted to say option A, but you're absolutely right. Privacy has to come first. Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Teddy
2 days ago
Definitely. Option D is the best choice for ensuring privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
6 days ago
Agreed. It's important to prioritize privacy in ML solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
11 days ago
That's a good point. Privacy should definitely come first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannie
17 days ago
I think we should define how data subjects may object to the processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
1 months ago
Haha, I was about to go for option C, but then I realized that documenting false positive rates doesn't really address the privacy concerns. Nice catch, Pansy!
upvoted 0 times
Roselle
11 days ago
C: Definitely. It's crucial to prioritize privacy when implementing ML solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
15 days ago
B: That's a good point. It's important to address privacy concerns from the start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
17 days ago
A: I think we should first define how data subjects may object to the processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
2 months ago
I agree with Pansy. Privacy should be the top priority when evaluating ML solutions. Option D is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Marcos
10 days ago
User 3: Agreed, defining how data subjects may object to the processing is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
11 days ago
User 2: Definitely, we need to prioritize privacy. Option D seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 months ago
User 1: I think privacy is crucial when evaluating ML solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pansy
2 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Defining how data subjects can object to the processing is crucial for ensuring privacy and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
Odelia
1 months ago
I agree, it's important for organizations to have a clear process in place for data subjects to object to the processing of their information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
2 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Defining how data subjects can object to the processing is crucial for ensuring privacy and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linn
2 months ago
But shouldn't they also document the distribution of bias scores to address potential biases?
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
2 months ago
I agree with Gerri. It's important to ensure fairness in ML solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
2 months ago
I think the organization should first define their goals for fairness.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77