Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IASSC Exam ICYB Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for IASSC's ICYB exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 3
[All ICYB Questions]

A tool we use to identify possible failures (defects) in our process and the impact they may have is the _________________.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kathrine
3 months ago
I believe FMEA is the best option because it helps us prioritize risks based on their impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
3 months ago
FMEA is the obvious choice here. Unless the question is secretly testing our knowledge of Shewhart's ability to dance the Macarena, which would be a really niche skill for a process improvement tool.
upvoted 0 times
Wilson
3 months ago
Haha, I highly doubt Shewhart's dancing skills are relevant here. FMEA it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
3 months ago
I agree, FMEA is definitely the tool we use to identify possible failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Shewhart Analysis could also be a good tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
3 months ago
C) FMEA, no doubt about it. It's the go-to tool for this kind of thing. Though I do wonder if Juran Journey involves some sort of spiritual quest to find product quality enlightenment.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
2 months ago
D) SIPOC helps us understand the process inputs and outputs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
2 months ago
A) Shewhart Analysis is also important for identifying failures in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
2 months ago
C) FMEA, no doubt about it. It's the go-to tool for this kind of thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmett
4 months ago
I agree with Latricia, FMEA helps us identify potential failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with C) FMEA. It's the only one that really fits the description of identifying possible failures and their impact. The other choices just don't seem quite right.
upvoted 0 times
My
3 months ago
Yeah, FMEA is the way to go for that kind of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
4 months ago
I agree, FMEA is definitely the tool for identifying possible failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latricia
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) FMEA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
4 months ago
FMEA all the way! It's like a crystal ball for potential issues in our process. Plus, it sounds way cooler than the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Rene
4 months ago
SIPOC is useful too, but FMEA really stands out in predicting potential failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
4 months ago
I think Shewhart Analysis is also important for identifying defects, but FMEA does sound cooler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
4 months ago
I agree, FMEA is definitely the way to go. It helps us see into the future of our process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) FMEA. It's a tool used to identify potential failures and their impact, which is exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
Elise
4 months ago
Let's go with FMEA then. It makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
4 months ago
No, it's definitely not Shewhart Analysis. I'm leaning towards FMEA as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
4 months ago
I think it's Shewhart Analysis, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
4 months ago
I agree, FMEA is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77