IBM Exam C1000-065 Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-065 exam

Question #: 72
Topic #: 1

[All C1000-065 Questions]

When developing a report, which two should be defined for a JOIN query?

Aa reference to two queries

Bonly cached results

Can expression editor

Dan intersection of two queries

Ea relationship defining cardinality

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, D

by Francine at Sep 13, 2024, 04:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-065 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jody

2 months ago

I'm just going to go ahead and say E. Anything else would be like trying to bake a cake without a recipe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

2 months ago

The answer has to be E. If you don't have the relationship defined, how is the database supposed to know how to combine the data?

upvoted 0 times

Michel

12 days ago

Definitely, it's a crucial step in ensuring the data is accurately joined in the query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Twana

15 days ago

So, it's important to have the cardinality defined when developing a report.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elke

21 days ago

That makes sense, without defining the relationship, the database won't know how to combine the data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

1 months ago

I think the answer is E, you need to define the relationship for a JOIN query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phillip

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it could also be C) an expression editor.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

2 months ago

I agree with Linette, defining cardinality is crucial for a JOIN query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

2 months ago

E is the obvious choice here. Without defining the cardinality, your JOIN query is just going to be a hot mess.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linette

2 months ago

I think the answer is E) a relationship defining cardinality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

2 months ago

Haha, I almost went with D - an intersection of two queries. That would be a completely different type of operation! E is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Mireya

1 months ago

E is crucial for determining the relationship cardinality in a JOIN query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacklyn

1 months ago

D would have been a mistake, E is the right option for defining a JOIN query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

1 months ago

Definitely, E is essential for establishing the relationship cardinality in a JOIN query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannine

2 months ago

I agree, E is the correct choice for defining a JOIN query.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronna

3 months ago

Definitely E. Defining the cardinality of the relationship between the tables is essential for a JOIN to function correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolland

3 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is E. A relationship defining cardinality is crucial for a JOIN query to work properly.

upvoted 0 times

Alesia

2 months ago

Let's go with E then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darnell

2 months ago

No, it's definitely E. Cardinality is key for JOIN queries.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edna

2 months ago

I think it's either A or E.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hillary

2 months ago

I agree, E is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...