Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-147 Topic 5 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-147 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 5
[All C1000-147 Questions]

What is the required storage class and access mode settings for deployment of high speed transfer integration capability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alex
20 days ago
Hmm, this question looks like it was written by someone who's never actually deployed a high-speed transfer integration before. Let's see, D is the only one that makes any sense. *shakes head*
upvoted 0 times
Mike
1 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. D seems to be the most suitable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
7 days ago
User 1: I think D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Murray
1 months ago
I'm feeling lucky today, so I'm going to go with A. File system with read-write-many. What could possibly go wrong, right? *laughs nervously*
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 months ago
C is the way to go, folks. A block system with read-write-once is perfect for this. We don't want any of that read-write-many nonsense, that's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Mariko
2 days ago
I'm not so sure about D, I think A might be a safer choice for deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
3 days ago
I think D could also work well, as long as we are careful with the read-write-many access mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
14 days ago
I agree, C is definitely the best option for high speed transfer integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
16 days ago
C) Type: Block System and Access mode: Read-Write-Once
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
17 days ago
B) Type: File System and Access mode: Read-Only-Many
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
26 days ago
A) Type: File System and Access mode: Read-Write-Many
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
1 months ago
I agree with Chauncey. High speed transfer integration capability would need Read-Write-Many access mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 months ago
I'm going with B. Read-only-many sounds like it would work for this scenario. Who needs write access anyway? Just read the data and run!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is D. The high-speed transfer integration capability requires a block storage system with a read-write-many access mode. Anything less just won't cut it.
upvoted 0 times
Alison
14 days ago
User 4: Good to know, thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
19 days ago
User 3: So, D is the correct option for high-speed transfer integration capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
21 days ago
User 2: Yeah, you're right. It needs a block storage system with read-write-many access mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
23 days ago
I'm not sure, but C doesn't seem right for high-speed transfer integration. It's better to go with D for block storage and read-write-many access mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
26 days ago
User 1: I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
1 months ago
I think A might also work, as it is a file system with read-write-many access mode. But D seems more suitable for this specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
1 months ago
I agree, D is the correct answer. It provides the necessary storage class and access mode for high-speed transfer integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
I think the required storage class is Type: File System and Access mode: Read-Write-Many.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77