Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-156 Topic 2 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-156 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 2
[All C1000-156 Questions]

A ORadar administrator is trying to tune a rule so that it cannot send an email more than 10 times in a 24-hour period. Which method can be used to accomplish this goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To ensure that a rule in IBM QRadar SIEM V7.5 does not send an email more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, the 'response limiter' can be used. Here's how it works:

Response Limiter: This feature limits the number of times a rule action (such as sending an email) can be executed within a specified timeframe.

Configuration: Set the response limiter to a maximum of 10 actions in 24 hours.

Implementation: Apply the response limiter to the rule, ensuring that even if the rule conditions are met multiple times, the email will only be sent up to the specified limit.

Reference IBM QRadar SIEM documentation on rule management and tuning includes detailed instructions on using the response limiter to control the frequency of rule actions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Vi
2 months ago
I'm just hoping the exam doesn't have any trick questions like 'What's the square root of a penguin?' That would really ruffle my feathers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
2 months ago
I'm going with the 'execute custom action' rule response. It's got a certain je ne sais quoi, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Louisa
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but using a special rule test that limits the number of rule triggers could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
1 months ago
I agree, tuning the rule conditions to make it trigger fewer times might be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
1 months ago
I think using the 'response limiter' would be more effective in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mirta
2 months ago
I think both B) and C) could work, but I would go with C) because it seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct method is C) Tuning the rule conditions to make it trigger fewer times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
2 months ago
Well, if you can tweak the rule conditions to trigger fewer times, that might just do the trick. Gotta love a simple solution!
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
1 months ago
User 4: I'm not sure, but I think tuning the conditions is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 months ago
User 3: Using a special rule test could also work, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
2 months ago
Agreed, that seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 months ago
I think tuning the rule conditions is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilson
3 months ago
Hmm, not so sure about the 'test that limits the number of rule triggers' - sounds a bit complicated for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Evangelina
1 months ago
Agreed, let's give that a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 months ago
Yeah, that seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
I think we should go with option B) Using the 'response limiter'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darrin
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Using the 'response limiter'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
3 months ago
I think the 'response limiter' option is the way to go. Nice and simple, right?
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
2 months ago
Yeah, it's a straightforward solution to limit the number of emails sent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
2 months ago
I agree, the 'response limiter' seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77