Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-162 Topic 2 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-162 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 2
[All C1000-162 Questions]

The magnitude rating of an offense in QRadar is calculated based on which values?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The magnitude rating of an offense in QRadar is calculated based on relevance, severity, and credibility. Relevance determines the impact on the network, credibility indicates the integrity of the offense, and severity represents the level of threat. QRadar uses complex algorithms to calculate and periodically re-evaluate the offense magnitude rating.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Laurel
2 months ago
Wait, is this a QRadar question? I thought we were testing our knowledge of quantum mechanics. Guess I should have read the question more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Leonard
18 days ago
D) Criticality, severity, credibility
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
19 days ago
C) Criticality, severity, importance
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 months ago
B) Relevance, credibility, severity
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
1 months ago
A) Relevance, severity, importance
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carolynn
2 months ago
Hold up, is this a trick question? I feel like they're trying to slip in some curveball answer. I'm going with A) just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
2 months ago
B) Relevance, credibility, severity sounds like the way to go. Gotta factor in that credibility, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Olive
1 months ago
C) Criticality, severity, importance also play a role in calculating the magnitude rating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 months ago
B) Yeah, credibility is definitely important when assessing the severity of an offense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
2 months ago
A) Relevance, severity, importance are the key factors in determining the magnitude rating.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cordie
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards D) Criticality, severity, credibility. Seems like that would give a more well-rounded assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's C) Criticality, severity, importance. That just sounds like the most accurate way to calculate the magnitude rating.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
1 months ago
I agree with you, C) Criticality, severity, importance seems to make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I believe it's B) Relevance, credibility, severity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
1 months ago
I think it's actually A) Relevance, severity, importance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
2 months ago
I'm not sure. I think it could also be criticality, severity, and importance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
2 months ago
I agree with Whitney. Those values make sense for determining the offense rating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
3 months ago
I think the magnitude rating is based on relevance, severity, and importance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77