Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C2090-623 Topic 8 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C2090-623 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 8
[All C2090-623 Questions]

An administrator has configured authentication.

Which statement is true for users logging on to the application?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

How to adjust the session timeout in Cognos Analytics

References: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21998445


Contribute your Thoughts:

Rory
6 months ago
Ooh, this is a real brain-teaser! I'm going to go with option D, because who doesn't love a good lockout scenario? It's like a security bouncer for your account!
upvoted 0 times
Colene
5 months ago
I agree, it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
6 months ago
Yeah, getting locked out after too many failed attempts can protect your account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
6 months ago
I think option D sounds like a good security measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caren
6 months ago
Haha, this question is like a riddle wrapped in an enigma! I'm just going to close my eyes and point. *points to option B* There, that's my final answer!
upvoted 0 times
Leslie
5 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
5 months ago
I know right, it's like a puzzle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
5 months ago
Haha, this question is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Serina
6 months ago
This is a tough question, but I'm going to have to go with option A. I can't imagine users being able to access a 3rd party authentication provider namespace if anonymous access is enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with option C, since it makes sense that users would only be able to be logged into one namespace at a time.
upvoted 0 times
Ranee
5 months ago
Definitely. It's crucial for administrators to ensure secure access for users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
6 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to understand the limitations of authentication configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
6 months ago
Option C is correct. Users can only be logged on to one namespace at a time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fabiola
6 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one, but I'm leaning towards option B. Logging users off after a period of inactivity sounds like a reasonable security measure to me.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
5 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
6 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
6 months ago
I agree, logging users off after inactivity can help protect sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
6 months ago
I agree, that does sound like a good security measure to have in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
6 months ago
I think option B makes sense. It's important to have security measures in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
6 months ago
Option B) Users will be automatically logged off after a defined inactivity timeout period that is set in IBM Cognos Configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Murray
7 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer, as it seems to be the only one that accurately describes a scenario where a user can be locked out of their account due to failed login attempts.
upvoted 0 times
Darnell
5 months ago
Agreed, option D provides a necessary security feature for user accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
Security should always be a top priority when it comes to user authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
5 months ago
It's a common practice in many applications to lock out users after multiple failed login attempts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
6 months ago
Definitely, it helps prevent unauthorized access to the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
6 months ago
Yes, it's important to have security measures in place for failed login attempts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
6 months ago
I agree, option D makes the most sense in terms of user account lockout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
6 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77