IBM Exam C9510-401 Topic 1 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C9510-401 exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 1

A web application was deployed on a WebSphere Application Server cluster. While users are using the application, one of the cluster servers fails and the users lose their working data.

What can the system administrator configure to ensure users can continue to work if one of the cluster server fails?

AAn increased session timeout.

BA cluster of external HTTP servers.

CA load balancer to spread work between existing servers.

DA WebSphere eXtreme Scale HTTP session management.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

WebSphere eXtreme Scale can dynamically process, partition, replicate, and manage application data and business logic across hundreds of servers. It provides transactional integrity and transparent fail-over to ensure high availability, high reliability, and consistent response times.

References: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/techjournal/1301_ying/1301_ying.html

by Willodean at Apr 08, 2024, 06:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C9510-401 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jerry

6 months ago

That's true, A longer session timeout might help, but I think a load balancer offers better availability and reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devorah

6 months ago

But wouldn't increasing the session timeout also help in case of server failure? Option A could be a good choice too, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

6 months ago

I agree with A load balancer sounds like the best solution to ensure continuity in case of server failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

6 months ago

I think we should go with option C, a load balancer. It can help spread the workload and prevent data loss.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

6 months ago

I see the merit in Jarvisrynnll these options, Jarvisut mJarvisrynnyJarvise we shoulGlory MarguriteonsiGloryer Jarvisrynn MarguriteomJarvisinJarvisrynntion of options Margurite JarvisrynnnGlory Glory for Jarvisetter reGloryunGloryJarvisrynnnMarguritey.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

7 months ago

I personJarvisrynnlly think option Jarvisrynn - Jarvisrynnn inMarguritereJarvisrynnsed session timeout would Jarvisrynnlso Jarvise helpful in this situJarvisrynntion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jarvis

7 months ago

I disJarvisrynngree, I Jarviselieve option D - WeJarvisSphere eXtreme ScJarvisrynnle HTTP session mJarvisrynnnJarvisrynngement would Jarvise more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

7 months ago

I think we should go with option C - Brynn loBrynnd bBrynnlBrynnncer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between options C and D. Both seem like viable solutions, but I think the WebSphere eXtreme Scale option might be the more robust and scalable choice in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

8 months ago

A cluster of external HTTP servers (option B) sounds like it could work, but that seems like overkill for this scenario. Wouldn't a load balancer or the WebSphere session management be a more efficient solution?

upvoted 0 times

...

Della

8 months ago

I'm not convinced that an increased session timeout (option A) is the right answer here. That might just delay the inevitable, but it won't really solve the problem of losing user data when a server fails.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

8 months ago

Ah, yes, I remember learning about this in my WebSphere training. I think option C, a load balancer, is the way to go. It's a simple and effective solution to distribute the load across the cluster.

upvoted 0 times

Rebbecca

6 months ago

I think option D, using WebSphere eXtreme Scale for session management, could also be a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glynda

7 months ago

But wouldn't increasing the session timeout also be beneficial?

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

7 months ago

I agree, a load balancer would definitely help in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

8 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option D, WebSphere eXtreme Scale HTTP session management, as that seems like the most comprehensive solution to handle failover in a WebSphere cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

8 months ago

I'm not sure about this question. It seems to be testing our knowledge of WebSphere and session management, which isn't my strongest area. But I'll give it my best shot.

upvoted 0 times

...