Following an IT systems audit, management agreed to implement a specific control in one of the IT systems. After a period, the internal auditor followed up and learned that management had not implemented the agreed management action due to the decision to move to another IT system that has built-in controls, which may address this risks highlighted by the Internal audit Which of the following Is the most appropriate action to address the outstanding audit recommendation?
Verification of Controls: The auditor should verify that the new IT system addresses the previously identified risks. This involves reviewing the system documentation and ensuring that the controls in the new system effectively mitigate the risks.
Reporting: Once the auditor has confirmed that the new system controls address the risks, they can report to senior management and close the outstanding issue, ensuring that all audit recommendations are appropriately resolved.
Other Options:
Accepting Management's Explanation: Without verification (option B) is not appropriate as it may leave risks unmitigated.
Escalating Without Verification: Advising management and escalating (option C) is premature if the new system may already address the issues.
Detailed Process Evaluation: Requiring additional details about the process (option D) may be unnecessary if the auditor can verify the controls directly.
According to IIA guidance, which of the following statements is true regarding audit workpapers?
Audit workpapers are essential documents that provide evidence of the audit work performed and the conclusions reached.
Option A: While review notes can be useful, they do not need to be retained if they do not add value to the audit evidence.
Option B: Audit workpaper documentation policies are typically established by the internal audit department, not reviewed or approved by the audit committee.
Option C: Management should not review the workpapers for accuracy as this could compromise the independence of the audit.
Option D: Preparing workpapers helps auditors document their work thoroughly, facilitating learning and professional development.
Which of the following documents are internal auditors most likely to be asked to sign as a demonstration of due professional care?
Professional Responsibility: Internal auditors are expected to demonstrate their commitment to professional standards and ethics.
Code of Ethics: The IIA's Code of Ethics outlines principles that internal auditors must follow, including integrity, objectivity, confidentiality, and competency.
Annual Declaration: Signing an annual declaration reinforces the auditor's commitment to these principles and ensures ongoing adherence to the professional standards.
Demonstration of Due Care: By signing this declaration, auditors formally acknowledge their responsibility to uphold ethical standards, which is a demonstration of due professional care.
The IIA's Code of Ethics.
The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.
According to IIA guidance, which of the following steps should precede the development of audit engagement objectives?
Risk Assessment: Before developing audit engagement objectives, a thorough risk assessment should be conducted. This step helps identify and prioritize the areas of highest risk, ensuring that the audit focuses on the most critical issues.
Establishing Objectives: The results of the risk assessment guide the development of specific, relevant, and focused audit objectives. This ensures that the engagement addresses key risk areas and adds value to the organization.
Sequential Steps: Identification of controls, scope establishment, and review of resources are important steps but typically follow the initial risk assessment to ensure the audit is aligned with the organization's risk profile.
When taken by a chief audit executive, which of the following actions would be most likely to prevent division management from exaggerating sales reports
1. Announcing a series of internal audit engagements focusing on compliance with corporate sales-reporting policies.
2. Asking the president and the board to issue a statement of corporate policy stressing the importance of accurate management reporting and the negative consequences of intentional misreporting
3. Setting up a hotline for employees to report fraudulent behavior anonymously.
4. Assisting the controller in developing and monitoring a series of business process indicators, which are historically correlated with, but independent of. sales.
Corporate Policy Statement: Having the president and the board issue a statement stressing the importance of accurate management reporting and the negative consequences of intentional misreporting can help set a tone at the top. This reinforces the significance of ethical behavior and compliance with reporting policies across the organization.
Business Process Indicators: Assisting the controller in developing and monitoring business process indicators that are historically correlated with, but independent of, sales can provide an objective means to validate sales reports. This reduces the opportunity for management to exaggerate sales figures as these indicators can act as a control mechanism.
Other Options:
Internal Audit Engagements: While announcing a series of internal audit engagements (option 1) might deter some misreporting, it might not be as effective as a strong policy statement combined with objective monitoring indicators.
Hotline for Reporting Fraud: Setting up a hotline (option 3) is useful for detecting fraud but might not directly prevent exaggeration in sales reports as effectively as business process indicators.
Margurite
10 days agoDesirae
21 days agoShalon
25 days agoRicki
1 months agoColetta
2 months agoWilda
2 months agoChuck
2 months agoGenevieve
3 months agoMerlyn
3 months agoLajuana
3 months agoClay
3 months agoLashunda
3 months agoCandra
4 months agoCharlette
6 months ago