Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA Exam CBAP Topic 2 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 2
[All CBAP Questions]

A large insurance company wants to buy a new claims processing system or upgrade one of its two existing system. Each year the claims department is given a $3.5 million budget to spend. Time is of the essence since there are tome regulatory charges that will be coming the following year that will require several features that currently neither one of the two claims System currently support.

There are eight stakeholders onvolved in this initiative. There are local to where the claim system are managed, while five are located across the country. The business analyst (BA) struggled to get all stakeholders to agree on the desired features but ultimately got agreement on ten identified key features for the new claims system. The BA was able to build a current state and future state process model which included all ten key features.

System a processes 75% of the company's claims. It is 5 years old and the claim processors love it because it is easy to use. However it must go offline for two hours each day. The code is very module so it does have flexibility to be modified. To upgrade system A to have all ten features it would cost $5 million. System A would be at capacity if it were to process all of the company's claims.

System B process 25% of the company's claims. It is an older mainframe system, but rarely goes offline. It could easily handle double the number of claims that system A processes. However it has a lot of legacy code and would cost $6 million to upgrade.

Both system have some of the tem desired key features. But neither system has all ten. The cost to buy a new system would be $7 million.

Below is the estimated cost for each feature in priority order.

If the budget for the initiative was firm, what is a feasible solution to make sure the project stays within budget?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Leatha
4 months ago
You know, if this was a game of 'Tetris,' I'd say go for Option B. Fitting in those first 8 features sounds like a perfect line clear!
upvoted 0 times
Trina
3 months ago
I agree, it's like clearing a line in Tetris. Efficient and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
4 months ago
Option B sounds like the best choice. Upgrading system A with the first 8 features seems like a good fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shasta
4 months ago
Option A? Seriously? Buying a new system and only getting 8 out of the 10 features? That's like trying to buy a car with no steering wheel. Hard pass.
upvoted 0 times
Alisha
4 months ago
Jose: Yeah, that makes more sense. Let's make sure we get the most important features first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
4 months ago
I agree, we should either upgrade system A or B with the first 8 features to stay within budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
4 months ago
Option A is definitely not the best choice. We need all 10 features for the new system.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lyla
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Upgrading System B might be a bit more expensive, but it can handle more claims and is more reliable. Plus, the legacy code is a bit concerning for the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Celestina
3 months ago
Yeah, upgrading System B might be a bit more expensive initially, but it seems like the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
3 months ago
I agree, System B seems like the best option for the long term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
3 months ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. System B can handle more claims and is reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
4 months ago
Yeah, upgrading System B with the first 8 features seems like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
4 months ago
I agree, System B seems like the best option for the long term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
4 months ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. System B can handle more claims and is reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeannetta
5 months ago
I agree with Dorthy. System A is used more, so upgrading it would benefit the majority of the claims processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
5 months ago
Option D is tempting, but I'm not sure buying a new system with only the first 5 features is the best use of the budget. We need to make sure we get the most bang for our buck.
upvoted 0 times
Eve
4 months ago
I agree, upgrading system A seems like the best option to stay within budget and still get the necessary features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
4 months ago
We should consider upgrading system A with the first 8 features. It's cost-effective and the claim processors already love using it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
Hmm, I think Option B is the way to go. Upgrading System A with the first 8 features seems like the most cost-effective solution, and it's already the preferred system among the claim processors.
upvoted 0 times
Devorah
4 months ago
System A's flexibility and user-friendliness make it a strong candidate for the upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
4 months ago
It would be cost-effective and efficient to enhance System A rather than buying a completely new system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
4 months ago
Agreed, upgrading System A with the first 8 features seems like a practical solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
5 months ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. System A is already well-liked by the claim processors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorthy
5 months ago
That's true, but system A processes 75% of the claims. It might be more efficient to upgrade it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
5 months ago
But upgrading system B with the first 8 features might be more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
5 months ago
I think we should upgrade system A with the first 8 features.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77