Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA Exam CCBA Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 4
[All CCBA Questions]

After an initial project kick-off meeting, the business analyst (BA) determined that the project has a short deadline and a regulatory mandate with stiff penalties for non-compliance. The stakeholders do not want to risk missing the deadline, and management is willing to commit any amount of resources to meet the deadline. Which kind of approach is suitable for the initiative?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Roxane
5 months ago
I think a crystal clear development process could also work well in this situation, as it provides a clear roadmap and structure for the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
5 months ago
I agree with User2, an adaptive approach allows for changes and adjustments to be made throughout the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe an adaptive development process would be more suitable given the short deadline and regulatory mandate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
6 months ago
I think we should go with a predictive development process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
6 months ago
Exactly, we need to be able to adjust quickly to meet the deadline and comply with regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
6 months ago
I see your point, Serina. Predictive processes are more planned out, but in our case, adaptability is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
7 months ago
But wouldn't a predictive development process be more suitable in this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
7 months ago
Yes, I agree. With a short deadline and regulatory mandate, we need a flexible approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
7 months ago
I think we should go with an adaptive development process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
8 months ago
Predictive, Adaptive, Kanban - it's enough to make my head spin! I think we need to take a step back and really consider the core goals here. If it's all about hitting that deadline at all costs, then the Predictive approach might be the way to go. Otherwise, Adaptive or Kanban could be better suited to navigate the challenges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
8 months ago
You know, I'm kind of with Alaine on this one. Kanban sounds like it could be the sweet spot - structured enough to meet the deadline, but still adaptable enough to handle any curveballs. Plus, the visual workflow management aspect could be a lifesaver when we're trying to coordinate all those resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
8 months ago
Whichever approach we choose, I just hope it doesn't turn into a 'Crystal clear' disaster, am I right? Haha, sorry, I couldn't resist. But seriously, this is a tough call. I think I'm leaning towards the Adaptive approach - the flexibility might just be what we need to navigate this minefield.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
8 months ago
Hmm, I can see both sides on this one. But if I had to choose, I think the Kanban development process might be the best fit. It'll allow us to visualize the workflow, optimize the process, and keep things moving without getting bogged down in too much planning upfront. And with those resources at our disposal, we can really maximize the efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
Lashaun
7 months ago
Predictive development process might also work well in this case. It allows for planning and predicting potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
7 months ago
I see your point, Antonio. But I think Crystal clear development process could ensure a clear path to meeting the deadline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
7 months ago
I think the Adaptive development process might be better. It allows for flexibility and adaptation to changes in requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
7 months ago
I agree, Kanban development process sounds like a good fit for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleshia
8 months ago
I don't know, man. Predictive sounds a bit rigid for a project with that kind of pressure. I'm leaning more towards an Adaptive approach. With management on board, we can pivot quickly and course-correct as needed to stay in front of those penalties. Plus, it'll keep the team nimble and responsive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
8 months ago
Whoa, this question is a tricky one! Short deadline, regulatory mandate, and management willing to throw resources at it - sounds like a real pressure cooker of a project. I'm thinking the Predictive development process might be the way to go here. We need to plan and control everything from the start to meet that deadline, no room for adaptability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77