Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA Exam CCBA Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 4
[All CCBA Questions]

Two stakeholders are arguing over which model to use for describing requirements. One insists that using an activity diagram is superior while the other prefers a state diagram. How should the business analyst (BA) resolve the conflict?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cyril
2 months ago
Option B is clearly the way to go - let them duke it out in a good ol' fashioned model-off. Loser has to buy the BA a coffee. Or, you know, a stronger drink.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
2 months ago
Option C is a bold move, but I'm not sure introducing a third model is the way to go. Seems like it might just create more confusion. Keep it simple, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
2 months ago
I'm with the stakeholder who prefers the state diagram. It's just more fun to draw, you know? But option A makes the most sense for resolving this conflict.
upvoted 0 times
Alton
24 days ago
Stakeholder 1: That sounds like a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
25 days ago
BA: We can use both models, they complement each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
29 days ago
Stakeholder 2: I prefer the activity diagram, it provides a clearer view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
30 days ago
Stakeholder 1: I think we should use the state diagram for requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the best solution. A fusion model that integrates the two would be a wise compromise. Gotta keep those stakeholders happy, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
3 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. The models are complementary, not mutually exclusive. The BA should explain how they can work together to get a more complete picture.
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
2 months ago
Yes, the BA should emphasize that the models complement each other. This way, both stakeholders can see the value in using a combination of activity and state diagrams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 months ago
I agree, using both models can help capture different aspects of the system. It's important for the BA to communicate this to the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
Option A is definitely the best choice. The activity diagram and state diagram can work together to provide a comprehensive view of the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
3 months ago
I believe the BA should suggest a fusion model that combines both diagrams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
3 months ago
I prefer using a state diagram, it's more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
3 months ago
I think we should use an activity diagram for requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77