IIBA Exam ECBA Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's ECBA exam

Question #: 99
Topic #: 1

[All ECBA Questions]

What requirements are good candidates for reuse?

ARequirements without direct ties to a particular tool

BRequirements expressed in more detail

CRequirements at low levels of abstraction

DRequirements with specific references to departments

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Requirements that are good candidates for reuse are those that are not tied to a specific tool, technology, or system. These requirements are generally applicable across various contexts and can be used in multiple projects without significant changes. They are typically high-level business requirements that describe what the business needs without prescribing how to achieve it. This makes them flexible and adaptable to different situations, which is essential for reuse.

by Kristel at Sep 19, 2024, 04:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ECBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Devorah

2 months ago

I'd go for option A. Keeps things flexible and avoids the dreaded 'vendor lock-in'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalyn

2 months ago

Ha! Requirements with department references? Might as well just name the company too. Good one!

upvoted 0 times

Arlen

19 days ago

C) Requirements at low levels of abstraction

upvoted 0 times

...

Michel

1 months ago

B) Requirements expressed in more detail

upvoted 0 times

...

Lino

1 months ago

A) Requirements without direct ties to a particular tool

upvoted 0 times

...

Isabella

2 months ago

Definitely not the ones with specific references to departments. That's way too specific and tied to a particular organization.

upvoted 0 times

Kate

1 months ago

C) Requirements at low levels of abstraction

upvoted 0 times

...

Albina

1 months ago

B) Requirements expressed in more detail

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawanda

2 months ago

A) Requirements without direct ties to a particular tool

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

2 months ago

I agree with Alexia. Requirements at a higher level of abstraction are more reusable. But I'd still want some detail, not just vague statements.

upvoted 0 times

Kimi

1 months ago

C) Requirements at low levels of abstraction

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

1 months ago

B) Requirements expressed in more detail

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

2 months ago

A) Requirements without direct ties to a particular tool

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

3 months ago

I believe requirements expressed in more detail can also be good candidates for reuse, as they provide a clear understanding of what needs to be done.

upvoted 0 times

...