Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IMANET Exam CMA Topic 6 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for IMANET's CMA exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 6
[All CMA Questions]

Book rate of return is an unsatisfactory guide to selecting capital projects because

I . It uses accrual accounting numbers

II . It compares a single project against the average of capital rejects.

III . It uses cash flows to gauge the desirability of the project.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A common misstep in regard to capital budgeting is the temptation to gauge the desirability of a project by using accrual accounting numbers instead of cash flows. Net income and book value are affected by the compas choices of accounting methods. A project's true rate of return cannot be dependent on bookkeeping decisions. Another distortion inherent in comparing a single project's book rate of return to the current one for the company as a whole is that the latter is an average of all of a firm's capital projects. Embedded in that average number 'may be a hand Full of good projects melding up for a large number of poor investments.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Stephen
2 months ago
You know, the book rate of return is about as useful as a chocolate teapot. Option D nails it - it's just not a reliable way to evaluate capital projects. I'll stick with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
Hmm, option C seems a bit too simplistic. The book rate of return has multiple shortcomings, as outlined in the other options. I'd have to go with D to cover all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
Hyun
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option D is the most comprehensive. Using cash flows to gauge the desirability of the project is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more accurate. Comparing a single project against the average of capital projects is crucial in decision-making.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Accrual accounting numbers are important to consider when selecting capital projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mabel
2 months ago
Haha, book rate of return? More like 'book of lies' am I right? Seriously though, option D is the way to go. It covers all the key issues with this outdated metric.
upvoted 0 times
Karan
1 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
1 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
2 months ago
I believe the correct answer is D) I, II, & III because it uses cash flows to gauge the desirability of the project as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
2 months ago
I agree with you, Carri. It also compares a single project against the average of capital projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
3 months ago
I totally agree with option B. The book rate of return is flawed because it uses accrual accounting numbers and compares a single project against the average of capital rejects, which doesn't really tell us much about the true desirability of the project.
upvoted 0 times
Rodolfo
3 months ago
Yeah, I think option B covers all the flaws of using book rate of return.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carri
3 months ago
I think the book rate of return is not a good guide because it uses accrual accounting numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77