Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 Exam CISSP Topic 4 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's CISSP exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 4
[All CISSP Questions]

An information security professional is reviewing user access controls on a customer-facing application. The application must have multi-factor authentication (MFA) in place. The application currently requires a username and password to login. Which of the following options would BEST implement MFA?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Edmond
5 months ago
But what if the user travels frequently? Option D would still be more secure in that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is better as it adds an extra layer of security by geolocating the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
5 months ago
Option D is the way to go! I mean, an automatically generated number from a hardware token? That's the epitome of multi-factor authentication. Gotta love that extra layer of security, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Bettina
4 months ago
I agree, having that automatically generated number is a great way to ensure only authorized users can access the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
4 months ago
Option D is definitely the best choice. That hardware token adds a solid extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herman
5 months ago
Haha, option B? Really? A pre-selected number? That's about as secure as using 'password123' as your login. D all the way, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
5 months ago
D is definitely the most secure option. Who wants to rely on something as flimsy as a pre-selected number or secret question? Bring on the hardware token!
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
4 months ago
Hardware tokens are the best choice for MFA. D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
5 months ago
I prefer the hardware token as well. It adds an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
5 months ago
I think D is the way to go too. Hardware tokens are much more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
5 months ago
I agree, D is definitely the most secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linsey
5 months ago
Hmm, I'd say D is the clear winner here. Can't beat the convenience of a hardware token, plus it adds that extra layer of protection. Beats having to remember a secret question any day!
upvoted 0 times
Vivienne
4 months ago
Yeah, D is the most reliable choice for sure. It's quick and easy to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
5 months ago
I agree, D is definitely the most secure option. Hardware tokens are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edmond
5 months ago
I think option D is the best choice because it involves something the user has (the hardware token).
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
6 months ago
Option D is the way to go! An automatically generated number from a hardware token is the epitome of multi-factor authentication. Gotta love that extra layer of security!
upvoted 0 times
Patti
5 months ago
Definitely, using a hardware token for generating numbers adds a strong layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
5 months ago
I agree, option D is the most secure choice for implementing MFA.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77