Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISM Exam INTE Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISM's Supply Management Integration exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 1
[All Supply Management Integration Questions]

DEF, Inc. is in the ramp-up phase of a unique medical device. The device has a two-year life expectancy. The sales forecast for the ramp-up period is as follows:

Month Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

Unit Sales 100 150 200 600 1,400 2,200 4,000 10,000

Demand after February is expected to remain at 10,000 units per month for several months, then decrease gradually. The units are small, and thus maintaining an inventory of up to 10,000 units is possible.

There are only three suppliers capable of providing the specialized component critical to this product. The production capacities of these suppliers are as follows:

* Supplier X has a capacity of 500 units per month at a cost of S20 per unit, representing 80% of its total business

* Supplier Y has a capacity of 2,000 units per month at a cost of S2O.5O per unit, representing 50% of its total business

* Supplier Z has a capacity of 20,000 units per month at a cost of $20.70 per unit, representing 10% of its total business

Two of these companies---Supplier X and Supplier Y---are minority businesses.

Given this situation, DEF should contract with

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contracting with all three suppliers in a tiered system allows DEF, Inc. to diversify its supply chain, supporting both minority businesses and ensuring capacity to meet demand. This strategy balances cost, supplier diversity, and risk management, aligning with best practices in supply chain management.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Una
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the folks at DEF are wishing they had more than three suppliers to choose from! Talk about a limited market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
1 months ago
I think option D is the way to go, we need to ensure we have enough supply from each supplier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
2 months ago
D sounds like the way to go. Spread it out across the three suppliers, but with a clear allocation plan to make sure the minority businesses get a fair share.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawnda
1 months ago
Agreed, spreading the production across all three suppliers is a good strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
1 months ago
D sounds like the best option. It's important to support minority businesses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joaquin
2 months ago
I agree with Felicidad, having multiple suppliers can help mitigate risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the best choice to diversify our suppliers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
2 months ago
I think we should go with option A and stick with Supplier Z only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
2 months ago
I see your point, Virgilio, but I think option B allows for more flexibility in case of unexpected changes in demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
2 months ago
I disagree. I believe option A is the best choice for meeting demand efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
I agree with Brinda. It seems like the most balanced approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
2 months ago
I think we should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Supplier Z has the highest capacity, so going with them exclusively could be a good option to simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
Lemuel
2 months ago
But what about working with Suppliers X and Y to increase their production capability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
2 months ago
I think going with Supplier Z exclusively could be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lacresha
2 months ago
I think the answer is B. Splitting the supply across the three suppliers seems like the best way to manage the ramp-up and ensure reliable delivery.
upvoted 0 times
Kina
2 months ago
That's a good point, but having Supplier Z as a backup for the remaining demand could be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to focus on increasing production capability with Suppliers X and Y?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
2 months ago
I agree, spreading the supply across multiple suppliers reduces risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77