Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISM Exam INTE Topic 5 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISM's INTE exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 5
[All INTE Questions]

A firm engaging in low-cost country sourcing wants to assume the least amount of risk when importing goods into its own country. Which of the following Incoterms 2020 rules would be MOST useful in achieving this goal7

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In the context of low-cost country sourcing and minimizing risk when importing goods, the selection of appropriate Incoterms 2020 rules is crucial.

DAP (Delivered at Place) is the most suitable Incoterm for a firm wanting to assume the least amount of risk. Under DAP, the seller is responsible for all costs and risks associated with delivering the goods to a specified destination, which includes transportation, export customs clearance, and any other logistical arrangements until the goods are made available for unloading at the buyer's location. This significantly reduces the buyer's risk as the seller handles most of the transportation and logistics.

Other Incoterms, such as:

CFR (Cost and Freight): The seller pays for the cost and freight to bring the goods to the port of destination. However, the risk is transferred to the buyer once the goods are loaded on the vessel.

CPT (Carriage Paid To): Similar to CFR, but can be used for any mode of transport. The seller covers transport costs to a specified destination, but the risk transfers to the buyer upon handing over the goods to the first carrier.

EXW (Ex Works): The buyer assumes all risks and costs from the seller's premises onward, making it the highest risk for the buyer.


Incoterms 2020 by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

'A Guide to Incoterms 2020' by the International Trade Centre (ITC)

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mendy
4 months ago
This is a tricky one. As a professional wrestler, I know a thing or two about grappling with risk. DAP sounds like the safest move to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
4 months ago
CFR might be a good compromise - the seller handles the main transport, but the buyer is responsible for importing the goods.
upvoted 0 times
Twana
3 months ago
Yes, CFR is a good option for minimizing risk in low-cost country sourcing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
3 months ago
CFR might be a good compromise - the seller handles the main transport, but the buyer is responsible for importing the goods.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Magda
4 months ago
EXW seems like the easiest option for the firm. They don't have to worry about anything once the goods leave the supplier's location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
4 months ago
I think DAP would be the best choice to minimize risk during imports. It places the most responsibility on the seller, which is what this firm wants.
upvoted 0 times
Carin
3 months ago
I also think DAP is the best option for minimizing risk during imports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
3 months ago
I think EXW would be better because it gives the buyer more control over the shipment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
4 months ago
I agree, DAP is a good choice because it shifts the risk to the seller.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nancey
5 months ago
I think A) CFR might be the best choice because it transfers the risk to the buyer once the goods are on board the vessel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
5 months ago
I see your point, Alecia. But I think B) CPT could also be a good option as it ensures the seller is responsible for the main carriage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) DAP as it shifts the risk to the seller until the goods are delivered to the buyer's location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I think the answer is C) EXW because it places the least amount of risk on the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77