Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 2 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

You are working in a project that developed a product that has reached a stable state and is

deployed on different HW configurations all over Europe.

You management decided to use your project as Proof of Concept for adopting CI as a new way of

working. The POC was implemented on one set of hardware and was successful.

Which of the following actions is a good next step?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lashawnda
4 months ago
I don't know about you, but I'm feeling a bit 'hardware-y' today. Anyone else up for a game of 'Guess the CPU'?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
4 months ago
Dynamically selecting tests based on changes? Brilliant! That's a great way to optimize the CI process and get faster feedback.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
2 months ago
It would definitely help us focus on executing only the test cases affected by changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
3 months ago
Implementing code to dynamically select CI tests sounds like a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
3 months ago
I agree, it would help us test the different hardware configurations deployed in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
3 months ago
I think enabling different test configurations in the CI process is a good next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olen
4 months ago
Reducing the number of tests? That sounds like a recipe for disaster. We need to ensure we're catching all potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
4 months ago
I see both points, but I think option A is more important for ensuring our product works on all configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better. We should only run tests affected by changes to save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
4 months ago
Decreasing UI testing might not be the best idea. It's important to maintain comprehensive testing coverage, even if it takes longer.
upvoted 0 times
Glendora
3 months ago
D) Implement code to dynamically select CI tests, executing only test cases affected by changes
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
B) I agree, reducing UI testing might lead to missing critical bugs. It's better to have comprehensive testing coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
A) Enable different test configurations in the CI process to test different configurations that are deployed in the market
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leila
4 months ago
I think option A is a good next step. We need to test different configurations in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
4 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. Testing different hardware configurations is crucial to ensure the product works reliably across the market.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
3 months ago
Alex: That way, we can catch any potential issues before they reach the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
3 months ago
We should definitely focus on expanding our test configurations in the CI process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
Yes, it's important to cover all possible scenarios to ensure the product's stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
4 months ago
I agree, testing different hardware configurations is essential for reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77