Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

You are working in a project that developed a product that has reached a stable state and is

deployed on different HW configurations all over Europe.

You management decided to use your project as Proof of Concept for adopting CI as a new way of

working. The POC was implemented on one set of hardware and was successful.

Which of the following actions is a good next step?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dierdre
5 months ago
Option D sounds like the perfect solution. Dynamically selecting tests based on changes? Genius! Though, I hope the tests don't end up selecting themselves and taking over the world. Just a thought.
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
3 months ago
Beth: Haha, let's hope the tests don't become too powerful and start running the show!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
3 months ago
Beth: I agree, it would definitely save time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
4 months ago
Option D sounds like the perfect solution. Dynamically selecting tests based on changes? Genius!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
4 months ago
I agree, dynamically selecting CI tests based on changes could save a lot of time and effort. Let's hope they don't become too powerful though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
4 months ago
User Comment: Haha, that would be a nightmare if the tests started selecting themselves! But yeah, Option D seems like a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
4 months ago
Option D does sound like a great idea. Selecting tests based on changes could really optimize the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brice
5 months ago
I see both points. Maybe we can combine options A and D to have a comprehensive testing approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
5 months ago
Ha! Decreasing UI tests? That's like trying to drive a car without a steering wheel. Option A is the way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
5 months ago
I'm not convinced that reducing tests is the way to go. That could compromise our product's quality. Option D sounds interesting, though.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
4 months ago
That's true, we need to balance efficiency with thorough testing to maintain product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
4 months ago
But wouldn't enabling different test configurations also be important to ensure compatibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
5 months ago
I agree, it would be more efficient to only run tests that are affected by changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
Option D sounds like a good idea. It could help us focus on the tests that matter most.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edgar
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better. We should only execute test cases affected by changes to save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
Definitely go with option A. Testing different hardware configurations is crucial for ensuring our product works seamlessly across the market.
upvoted 0 times
Emeline
5 months ago
D) Implement code to dynamically select CI tests, executing only test cases affected by changes
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
5 months ago
That's a good point. We need to make sure our product is compatible with all hardware configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
5 months ago
A) Enable different test configurations in the CI process to test different configurations that are deployed in the market
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emerson
6 months ago
I think option A is a good next step. We need to test different configurations in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77