Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Topic 7 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TA_Syll2019 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 7
[All CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Questions]

You have been given a user story for an ATM application and have been reviewing it. The following are two of the acceptance criteria:

AC 1: The account balance must be displayed to the user as fast as possible to ensure they do not leave during the transaction.

AC 2: The user must log in easily before they can display their balance

From the information provided here and by applying the review checklist in the syllabus, what is the major problem with the acceptance criteria?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kimberlie
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm gonna have to go with the classic 'D) The acceptance criteria are not prioritized'. How do we know which one is more important? Seems like a classic case of 'all the bells and whistles' syndrome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
4 months ago
I think the acceptance criteria should be prioritized to ensure the most important aspects are tested first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
4 months ago
I'm going with B as well. 'Fast as possible' and 'easily' are way too vague. This feels more like a user goal than a testable acceptance criterion.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
3 months ago
C) The story is not independent from other stories
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
I'm going with B as well. 'Fast as possible' and 'easily' are way too vague. This feels more like a user goal than a testable acceptance criterion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
4 months ago
B) The acceptance criteria are not testable
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
4 months ago
A) The feature is not clearly defined
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linette
5 months ago
I believe the story is not independent from other stories, which could cause issues with implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
5 months ago
Definitely B. These acceptance criteria are not concrete enough to test against. Needs more specific requirements like 'display balance within 3 seconds of login' or 'login in less than 10 seconds'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
5 months ago
I agree with Nelida, if we can't test the criteria, how can we ensure the feature works as intended?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
5 months ago
I'd say the major problem is that the acceptance criteria are not testable. How do you measure 'as fast as possible'? And 'easily' is pretty subjective.
upvoted 0 times
Davida
4 months ago
B) The acceptance criteria are not testable
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
5 months ago
A) The feature is not clearly defined
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josphine
5 months ago
AC 1 and AC 2 seem to be contradictory. How can the balance be displayed quickly if the user has to log in first? Seems like a classic case of 'move fast and break things'.
upvoted 0 times
Bobbye
4 months ago
D) The acceptance criteria are not prioritized
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
4 months ago
C) The story is not independent from other stories
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
4 months ago
B) The acceptance criteria are not testable
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
4 months ago
A) The feature is not clearly defined
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nelida
5 months ago
I think the major problem is that the acceptance criteria are not testable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77