Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

A chart showing the trend in the lag time from defect reporting to resolution during system testing is also available. The chart shows that the daily closure period is consistently and significantly above the rolling closure period for a long period of the system testing phase. Almost all defects found during system testing have been related to the system as a whole, not related to single units or integrations issues. Almost all quality risks have been addressed during the unit and integration testing phase and no residual quality risks were present in the integrated system. This has been confirmed by exploratory testing sessions performed during system testing, targeted at finding defects in these quality risk areas. Based on the given information only, which one of the following areas would you expect to be considered more in the retrospective meeting in order to be improved?

K3 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lai at Apr 25, 2024, 05:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tabetha
6 months ago
That's true, we need to ensure we are effectively managing defects and analyzing quality risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
7 months ago
But shouldn't we also focus on the quality risk analysis process, as all quality risks have been addressed in previous phases?
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
7 months ago
I agree with User1, since the lag time from defect reporting to resolution is consistently high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
7 months ago
I think the defect management process should be considered more in the retrospective meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
8 months ago
So we should discuss both the defect management process and quality risk analysis in the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
8 months ago
You're right, we need to ensure we address all potential risks in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
8 months ago
But don't you think the quality risk analysis process is just as important?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
8 months ago
That's a good point, making sure we catch any issues early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
8 months ago
Perhaps we also need to review the system design and architecture design reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
8 months ago
I agree, the trend in lag time from defect reporting to resolution is concerning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
8 months ago
I think we should consider the defect management process in the retrospective meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77