Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Assume you are the Test Manager in charge of independent testing for avionics applications. You are in charge of testing for a project to implement three different CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item):

- a BOOT-X CSCI that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard

- a DIAG-X CSCI that must be certified at level C of the DO-178B standard

- a DRIV-X CSCI that must be certified at level A of the DO-178B standard

These are three different software modules written in C language to run on a specific hardware platform.

You have been asked to select a single code coverage tool to perform the mandatory code coverage measurements, in order to meet the structural coverage criteria prescribed by the DO-178B standard. This tool must be qualified as a verification tool under DO-178B.

Since there are significant budget constraints to purchase this tool, you are evaluating an opensource tool that is able to provide different types of code coverage. This tool meets perfectly your technical needs in terms of the programming language and the specific hardware platform (it supports also the specific C-compiler).

The source code of the tool is available.

Your team could easily customize the tool to meet the project needs. This tool is not qualified as a verification tool under the DO-178B.

Which of the following are the three main concerns related to that open-source tool selection?

K4 3 credits (2 credits out of 3 credits correct, 1 credit point)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacquelyne
6 months ago
Also, we need to think about the licensing—option F. Confidentiality needs are strict in avionics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
6 months ago
Definitely! Qualification costs can be a big barrier. Budget constraints are an issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
6 months ago
But don't forget, qualifying it as a verification tool under DO-178B also costs money. We need to consider option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
7 months ago
Agreed. If it doesn't support those coverage types, it's useless for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
7 months ago
Yeah, I think the tool's coverage capability for levels A, B, and C of DO-178B is crucial. That's option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
7 months ago
Has anyone figured out the main concerns with selecting this open-source tool for code coverage?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77