iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 63
Topic #: 2

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

A chart showing the trend in the lag time from defect reporting to resolution during system testing is also available. The chart shows that the daily closure period is consistently and significantly above the rolling closure period for a long period of the system testing phase. Almost all defects found during system testing have been related to the system as a whole, not related to single units or integrations issues. Almost all quality risks have been addressed during the unit and integration testing phase and no residual quality risks were present in the integrated system. This has been confirmed by exploratory testing sessions performed during system testing, targeted at finding defects in these quality risk areas. Based on the given information only, which one of the following areas would you expect to be considered more in the retrospective meeting in order to be improved?

K3 3 credits

AThe requirements review

BThe defect management process

CThe quality risk analysis process

DThe system design and architecture design reviews

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Walker at Jul 06, 2024, 06:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Armanda

4 months ago

The requirements review could also use some improvement. After all, if the requirements were more clearly defined, the system design and architecture might have been more robust from the start.

upvoted 0 times

Kimbery

3 months ago

A) The requirements review

upvoted 0 times

...

Eliz

4 months ago

C) The quality risk analysis process

upvoted 0 times

...

Rachael

4 months ago

B) The defect management process

upvoted 0 times

...

Cornell

4 months ago

I think both the defect management process and the quality risk analysis process should be discussed in the retrospective meeting to ensure continuous improvement in our testing practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latia

4 months ago

Haha, looks like the developers forgot to add the 'Ctrl+Z' feature to the system. Maybe that's why the defects are so persistent!

upvoted 0 times

Maryann

3 months ago

D: It seems like there are some key areas that need to be looked at in the retrospective meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carisa

4 months ago

C: I agree, addressing quality risk analysis process could also be beneficial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erasmo

4 months ago

B: Yeah, that could definitely help with resolving issues faster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jill

4 months ago

A: Maybe they should focus on improving the defect management process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

5 months ago

I agree, the system design and architecture design reviews are the area that needs more attention. The fact that the defects are not related to single units or integration issues suggests that the root cause lies in the overall system design.

upvoted 0 times

Stanton

4 months ago

B: I disagree, I believe the quality risk analysis process is where we need to focus our attention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kasandra

5 months ago

A: I think the defect management process should be looked at more closely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

5 months ago

I believe the quality risk analysis process should also be considered for improvement, as it seems to have been effective in addressing quality risks during unit and integration testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wade

5 months ago

I agree with Kathryn, the trend in lag time from defect reporting to resolution indicates a need to improve the defect management process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hershel

5 months ago

The system design and architecture design reviews seem like the logical choice here. The chart shows that the defects are related to the system as a whole, not single units or integration issues, so the focus should be on improving the overall system design and architecture.

upvoted 0 times

Bok

4 months ago

D: Let's make sure to discuss this in the retrospective meeting to address any potential issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristin

4 months ago

C: The chart clearly shows that most defects are related to the system as a whole, so improving the design reviews makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

4 months ago

B: Yes, it seems like that area needs more attention based on the trend in defect reporting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

5 months ago

A: I agree, focusing on the system design and architecture reviews would be crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathryn

5 months ago

I think the defect management process should be discussed in the retrospective meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...