Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Assume you are the Test Manager in charge of independent testing for avionics applications. You are in charge of testing for a project to implement three different CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item):

- a BOOT-X CSCI that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard

- a DIAG-X CSCI that must be certified at level C of the DO-178B standard

- a DRIV-X CSCI that must be certified at level A of the DO-178B standard

These are three different software modules written in C language to run on a specific hardware platform.

You have been asked to select a single code coverage tool to perform the mandatory code coverage measurements, in order to meet the structural coverage criteria prescribed by the DO-178B standard. This tool must be qualified as a verification tool under DO-178B.

Since there are significant budget constraints to purchase this tool, you are evaluating an opensource tool that is able to provide different types of code coverage. This tool meets perfectly your technical needs in terms of the programming language and the specific hardware platform (it supports also the specific C-compiler).

The source code of the tool is available.

Your team could easily customize the tool to meet the project needs. This tool is not qualified as a verification tool under the DO-178B.

Which of the following are the three main concerns related to that open-source tool selection?

K4 3 credits (2 credits out of 3 credits correct, 1 credit point)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Val
3 months ago
Yes, cost is definitely a big factor. We need to ensure we can afford to qualify the tool properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
3 months ago
I believe another concern is the cost to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
3 months ago
Does the tool come with a 'DO-178B for Dummies' guide? Asking for a friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
3 months ago
The licensing better not be a headache, we don't want the avionics company's secrets leaking out.
upvoted 0 times
Caitlin
2 months ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
3 months ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
3 months ago
I hope the tool doesn't need a supercomputer to run! 4GB of RAM should be enough, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
3 months ago
E) Does the tool require a system with more than 4GB of RAM memory?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
3 months ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dell
3 months ago
I agree with Wade. It's crucial for the tool to cover all required levels of code coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
3 months ago
I think the main concern is if the tool supports all types of code coverage required by the DO-178B standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
3 months ago
Another concern could be the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
4 months ago
I agree with Harris, that's crucial for meeting the structural coverage criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
4 months ago
Qualifying the tool as a verification tool under DO-178B is going to be a major challenge and cost, so that's definitely a top concern.
upvoted 0 times
Soledad
2 months ago
F) Is the licensing scheme of the tool compatible with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
3 months ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 months ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Harris
4 months ago
I think the main concern is if the tool supports all types of code coverage required by the DO-178B standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
4 months ago
The open-source tool needs to support all the required coverage types across the three DO-178B levels, that's the most critical concern.
upvoted 0 times
Bettyann
4 months ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
4 months ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77