Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 3 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 3
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Assume you are the Test Manager in charge of independent testing for avionics applications. You are in charge of testing for a project to implement three different CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item):

- a BOOT-X CSCI that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard

- a DIAG-X CSCI that must be certified at level C of the DO-178B standard

- a DRIV-X CSCI that must be certified at level A of the DO-178B standard

These are three different software modules written in C language to run on a specific hardware platform.

You have been asked to select a single code coverage tool to perform the mandatory code coverage measurements, in order to meet the structural coverage criteria prescribed by the DO-178B standard. This tool must be qualified as a verification tool under DO-178B.

Since there are significant budget constraints to purchase this tool, you are evaluating an opensource tool that is able to provide different types of code coverage. This tool meets perfectly your technical needs in terms of the programming language and the specific hardware platform (it supports also the specific C-compiler).

The source code of the tool is available.

Your team could easily customize the tool to meet the project needs. This tool is not qualified as a verification tool under the DO-178B.

Which of the following are the three main concerns related to that open-source tool selection?

K4 3 credits (2 credits out of 3 credits correct, 1 credit point)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cristen
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the 4GB RAM requirement is a dealbreaker for some of the old-school avionics guys. They're probably still running their systems on 486 processors!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
5 months ago
Usability is important too. If the tool is a pain to use, it'll just slow down the testing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
5 months ago
The licensing scheme better be compatible with the company's needs. Can't have any confidentiality issues with an open-source tool, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Matthew
5 months ago
F) Is the licensing scheme of the tool compatible with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
5 months ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
5 months ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashanda
5 months ago
Another concern could be the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
5 months ago
I agree with Stephanie, that's crucial for meeting the certification levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
5 months ago
The key concern here is whether the open-source tool can provide the required code coverage for all three CSCI levels. That's the most important factor to consider.
upvoted 0 times
Fatima
4 months ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
4 months ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephanie
5 months ago
I think the main concern is if the tool supports all types of code coverage required by the DO-178B standard.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77