iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 3 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 70
Topic #: 3

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Which of the following statements best describes an appropriate approach for managing exploratory testing?

Number of correct responses: 1

K2 1 credit

ADefine very detailed mission statements, which allow testing work to be broken into sessions of up to 10 minutes duration in which testing is guided by these mission statements

BBreak the testing work in 30 to 120 minutes sessions and use properly defined mission statements consisting of two or three sentences to guide testing during these sessions

CDefine very generic charters to drive exploratory testing sessions of 2 days where testers are completely free to decide what to test

DExploratory testing should not be managed because such testing is inherently unmanageable and not measurable

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Jerilyn at Sep 18, 2024, 05:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Vonda

2 months ago

D? Unmanageable and unmeasurable? That's like saying we should just let the monkeys test the software. Not a chance!

upvoted 0 times

Bronwyn

16 days ago

D) Exploratory testing should not be managed because such testing is inherently unmanageable and not measurable

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiana

23 days ago

C) Define very generic charters to drive exploratory testing sessions of 2 days where testers are completely free to decide what to test

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecilia

30 days ago

B) Break the testing work in 30 to 120 minutes sessions and use properly defined mission statements consisting of two or three sentences to guide testing during these sessions

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecily

1 months ago

A) Define very detailed mission statements, which allow testing work to be broken into sessions of up to 10 minutes duration in which testing is guided by these mission statements

upvoted 0 times

...

Katlyn

2 months ago

B is the way to go. 30-120 minutes sounds about right to dive deep into different aspects of the system.

upvoted 0 times

Mertie

22 days ago

Yeah, 30-120 minutes sessions with defined mission statements make sense for effective testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

1 months ago

I think B is a good balance between structure and flexibility for exploratory testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacki

2 months ago

I agree, B seems like a good approach for managing exploratory testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fidelia

2 months ago

C gives too much freedom. Testers need some guidance, even in exploratory testing, to ensure they're covering the right areas.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julian

2 months ago

A is way too restrictive. 10-minute testing sessions? That's going to feel more like a race than actual exploratory testing.

upvoted 0 times

Anabel

1 months ago

A is way too restrictive. 10-minute testing sessions? That's going to feel more like a race than actual exploratory testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyssa

1 months ago

A is way too restrictive. 10-minute testing sessions? That's going to feel more like a race than actual exploratory testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ayesha

2 months ago

C) Define very generic charters to drive exploratory testing sessions of 2 days where testers are completely free to decide what to test

upvoted 0 times

...

Bulah

2 months ago

B) Break the testing work in 30 to 120 minutes sessions and use properly defined mission statements consisting of two or three sentences to guide testing during these sessions

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

2 months ago

C) Define very generic charters to drive exploratory testing sessions of 2 days where testers are completely free to decide what to test

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryl

2 months ago

B) Break the testing work in 30 to 120 minutes sessions and use properly defined mission statements consisting of two or three sentences to guide testing during these sessions

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

2 months ago

But with C, testers have too much freedom and may miss important areas to test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gene

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe C is the most appropriate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maricela

3 months ago

D? Seriously? That's just lazy. Exploratory testing may be less structured, but it still needs to be managed and measured to be effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

3 months ago

Hmm, B sounds like the most practical approach. Clearly defined mission statements to guide the testing sessions, but with enough flexibility to explore different areas.

upvoted 0 times