Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTFL-AuT Topic 4 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AuT exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 4
[All CTFL-AuT Questions]

You are a tester In a learn and you are supposed to test diagnostic functions and bus communications on the CAN bus. The development team provides you with compiled software code and control unit hardware. Which test environment Is the best choice considering the test types?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elli at Oct 24, 2024, 11:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AuT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bernardo
15 days ago
You know, I bet the development team would love it if we just jumped straight to the vehicle. But I think I'll go with option C and keep it in the HIL environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
18 days ago
Ha! Testing in the actual vehicle? That's a bit overkill, don't you think? Option C sounds like the perfect balance between realism and practicality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
24 days ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the best choice. Integrating the compiled software code into an environment model is the most cost-effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
Mertie
2 days ago
I agree, MiL test environment is the way to go for testing diagnostic functions and bus communications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
3 days ago
Option A is definitely the best choice. It's cost-efficient and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pedro
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B sounds promising too, as testing the bus performance in a SIL environment could give us valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
Refugia
10 days ago
User 4: I'm not sure, maybe we should consider testing in the vehicle as well to ensure everything works properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
11 days ago
User 3: Option B could be useful too, testing bus performance in a SIL environment could provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
15 days ago
User 2: I agree, but option C also sounds good as we can test bus communication with other participants in a realistic setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
23 days ago
User 1: I think option A is the best choice, as we can integrate the software code into an environment model easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katie
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) A hi test environment is better as it allows testing bus communication with other participants close to reality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 months ago
I think A) A MiL test environment is the best choice because we can integrate the software code cost efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Testing the bus communication with other participants in a HIL environment seems like the most realistic approach.
upvoted 0 times
Solange
22 days ago
I'm not sure, but testing in the vehicle seems like the most practical option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
24 days ago
I believe option B in a SaL test environment would provide better performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
25 days ago
I think option A in a MiL test environment would be more cost efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 months ago
I agree, option C in a HIL environment is the most realistic choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77