Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTFL_Syll2018 Topic 2 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll2018 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 2
[All CTFL_Syll2018 Questions]

You are responsible for applying the correct technique (or a review of the requirements document for a project to develop a new software application. You identify the reviewers and the required roles, including the meeting leader, who is the requirements document author, and a separate role for a scribe. Additionally, you decide to take a relatively informal approach to the requirements review. The goal of the review is to find defects in the requirements document, such as omissions, inconsistencies, and duplications. Another goal of the review is to improve the software application's usability and accessibility by considering the various stakeholders' viewpoints.

Which of the following statements BEST describes this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This scenario is using a walkthrough review type and a perspective-based review technique. A walkthrough is a type of review that is relatively informal and led by the author of the work product. A perspective-based review technique is a technique that involves reviewing the work product from different viewpoints or perspectives of various stakeholders. The scenario matches these descriptions, as it involves an informal approach, a meeting leader who is the author of the requirements document, and a goal of improving the software application's usability and accessibility by considering the various stakeholders' viewpoints. Option A is incorrect, as a pair review is a type of review that involves only two people, usually the author and another team member. Option C is incorrect, as a checklist-based review technique is a technique that involves reviewing the work product against a predefined list of items or criteria. Option D is incorrect, as it combines the incorrect descriptions of options A and C.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lynette
3 days ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. The walkthrough review type is mentioned, and the checklist-based technique where specific defects are looked for matches the goals of the review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
10 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) This scenario is using a pair review type and a perspective-based review technique could also be a valid option, as pair reviews involve two people working together to find defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
12 days ago
I agree with Laurena, because in a walkthrough review, the author leads the review and the focus is on understanding the requirements from different perspectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
18 days ago
I think the answer is B) This scenario is using a walkthrough review type and a perspective-based review technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
24 days ago
Option B seems like the best fit here. The scenario mentions a walkthrough review, which involves the author presenting the requirements document to a group of reviewers. And the perspective-based review technique where different stakeholder viewpoints are considered aligns with the goals described.
upvoted 0 times
Gary
9 days ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77