ISTQB Exam ATM Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam

Question #: 60
Topic #: 2

[All ATM Questions]

For which of the following activities would the costs be classified as a cost of detection? K2 1 credit

AWriting test specifications according to the test design

BTraining developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project

CRe-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect

DFixing field failures

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Noel at Sep 18, 2024, 09:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Samira

2 months ago

But wouldn't fixing field failures also be considered a cost of detection, since it involves identifying and correcting defects found in the field?

upvoted 0 times

...

Doretha

2 months ago

I agree with Delfina, because detecting defects during testing is part of the cost of detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreta

2 months ago

C, no doubt about it. Though I wish I could just wave a magic wand and make all the defects disappear!

upvoted 0 times

An

1 months ago

D) Fixing field failures

upvoted 0 times

...

Marshall

1 months ago

C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

1 months ago

B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project

upvoted 0 times

...

Mari

2 months ago

A) Writing test specifications according to the test design

upvoted 0 times

...

Renea

2 months ago

Option C, easy peasy. Unless you're a software development superhero who writes bug-free code on the first try every time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicki

2 months ago

C is the right answer. Debugging and confirming bug fixes - that's textbook detection work right there.

upvoted 0 times

Reynalda

2 months ago

C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect

upvoted 0 times

...

Dallas

2 months ago

B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

2 months ago

A) Writing test specifications according to the test design

upvoted 0 times

...

Delfina

3 months ago

I think the costs for re-running a test case would be classified as a cost of detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

3 months ago

Hmm, I'd have to go with C. Anything related to verifying and validating fixes should be considered a detection cost.

upvoted 0 times

Franklyn

2 months ago

D) Fixing field failures

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

2 months ago

C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

2 months ago

B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project

upvoted 0 times

...

Alfred

2 months ago

A) Writing test specifications according to the test design

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

3 months ago

Definitely C. Trying to catch and fix issues early in the testing phase is crucial for cost-effective quality assurance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domonique

3 months ago

Option C seems the most appropriate here. Rerunning a test to verify a fix is a key part of the detection process.

upvoted 0 times

Toi

2 months ago

I agree, that definitely falls under cost of detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylyn

2 months ago

C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect

upvoted 0 times

...