Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 2
[All ATTA Questions]

Part 7 "Test Process & Incident Management"

The development manager asks you to identify suitable test coverage entry criteria for a component test. Which TWO of the following would you recommend as appropriate for entry criteria to a component testing phase? 2 credits [K3]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glendora
3 months ago
I believe D is important too, code review can catch potential issues early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
3 months ago
I would also consider C, having a test log available is crucial for tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
3 months ago
I agree with you, statement coverage and static analysis are important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
3 months ago
I think A and E are good entry criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
3 months ago
100% statement coverage? That's like trying to catch a greased pig with your bare hands. I'd go with B and E - keep it simple, keep it sane.
upvoted 0 times
Emeline
3 months ago
Yeah, focusing on critical defects and major violations makes more sense for entry criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
I agree, 100% statement coverage seems unrealistic. B and E sound more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lizette
3 months ago
I believe having a test log available is crucial for tracking and documenting the testing process. So, C should also be included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
4 months ago
I would also consider D as a good entry criteria. Code review can help ensure quality before testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
4 months ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of test coverage criteria. I'd recommend B and E - no critical defects and a clean static analysis. That way, we can catch the low-hanging fruit before diving into the nitty-gritty details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
4 months ago
Hmm, I'd have to say B and D. No critical defects and a completed code review - that's a solid foundation to start component testing. Maybe they'll throw in a free unicorn with the passing grade too.
upvoted 0 times
Layla
2 months ago
Haha, a free unicorn would definitely make the testing process more fun!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
2 months ago
A completed code review is definitely important to ensure the quality of the code being tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
3 months ago
I agree, having no critical defects is crucial before starting component testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
3 months ago
E) Static analysis shows no major violations
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
3 months ago
A) 100% statement coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
3 months ago
User Comment: Definitely, a completed code review is also important to ensure the quality of the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
3 months ago
I agree, having no critical defects is crucial for starting component testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lelia
4 months ago
I agree with you, Anabel. Statement coverage and static analysis are important for component testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
4 months ago
C and D all the way! A test log and completed code review are must-haves to ensure the component is ready for testing. Who cares about statement coverage, as long as the basics are covered?
upvoted 0 times
Yolando
3 months ago
I think statement coverage is important too, it helps ensure that all parts of the code are being tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
4 months ago
I agree, having a test log and completed code review are essential before starting component testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tess
4 months ago
100% statement coverage? Are they kidding? That's way too stringent for a component test. I'd go with B and E - no critical defects and a clean static analysis report.
upvoted 0 times
Buddy
4 months ago
Definitely, those would be more appropriate entry criteria for a component testing phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
4 months ago
I think focusing on no critical defects and a clean static analysis report is more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
4 months ago
I agree, 100% statement coverage seems unrealistic for a component test.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anabel
4 months ago
I think A and E are good options for entry criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77