Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam CTAL-TTA Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTAL-TTA exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 6
[All CTAL-TTA Questions]

When conducting a data flow analysis of following section of pseudo code:

Declare Function_Biggest integer (inputl integer. Input2 Integer) }

Declare output Integer

Set output = inputl

If input2 > output then

Set output = input2

Endif

Return output

}

Which of the variables utilized above has a potential anomalie?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In the data flow analysis of the pseudocode, the variable output presents a potential anomaly. Initially, output is set to input1, but it may be overwritten if input2 is greater. The anomaly, specifically a 'definition-use' (du-path) issue, arises because there might be scenarios where output does not adequately reflect changes depending on the dynamic data flow influenced by the conditional. Proper testing and validation of such conditional structures are crucial to ensure that output consistently represents the largest of the two inputs as intended.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Regenia
5 months ago
This is a piece of cake! The correct answer is definitely C. 'output' is the variable with the potential anomaly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
5 months ago
I'd go with option C. 'output' seems to be the variable with the most potential for something weird happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
5 months ago
Wait, what's a 'Function_Biggest'? Sounds like a function named after a pastry or something.
upvoted 0 times
Adolph
3 months ago
The potential anomalie is with the variables input1 and input2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
3 months ago
Yeah, Function_Biggest is just the name of the function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
3 months ago
It's not Function_Biggest, it's just a function name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
3 months ago
Exactly, those are the variables that could potentially have an anomalie.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
3 months ago
Oh, I see. So the potential anomalie would be with the variables inputl and input2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
4 months ago
Function_Biggest is just the name of the function, it's not a variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
5 months ago
I think the potential anomalie is with Function_Biggest, as it is not being used correctly in the pseudo code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
5 months ago
But inputl and input2 are the variables being compared, so they could have anomalies too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the potential anomalie is with output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
5 months ago
I think the potential anomalie is with inputl and input2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
5 months ago
I don't see any issues with the variables. The code looks straightforward and should work as expected.
upvoted 0 times
Whitley
4 months ago
It's always good to review the code for any potential errors, even if it looks straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
4 months ago
Maybe we should double check how the output variable is being assigned in the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
4 months ago
I agree, it's possible that there could be an issue with how the output variable is being set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
5 months ago
I think the potential anomalie might be with the output variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamesha
5 months ago
The variable 'output' seems like it could have a potential anomaly. It's being used to store the maximum value between 'inputl' and 'input2', so it might be a good idea to check for any unexpected behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Susy
5 months ago
Yeah, it's used to store the maximum value between 'inputl' and 'input2'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
5 months ago
I think 'output' might have an anomaly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77