ISTQB Exam CTFL-Foundation Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTFL-Foundation exam

Question #: 14
Topic #: 1

Refer to the Exhibit.

The decision table above shows a company's fuel expenses structure.

Which of the following Test Cases based on the decision table are Valid?

Test Case 1:

An employee who is not a car or motorcycle driver attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim not allowed.

Test Case 2:

An employee who drives a 1700cc diesel car attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band C.

Test Case 3:

An employee who rides a motorcycle attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band A.

ATest Cases 1 and 3 are Valid, Test Case 2 is Invalid.

BTest Cases 2 and 3 are Valid, Test Case 1 is Invalid

CTest Cases 1, 2 and 3 are all Valid.

DTest Cases 2 is Valid, Test Cases 1 and 3 are Invalid

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by An at May 23, 2024, 02:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Karl

6 months ago

I'm voting for C. All three test cases seem to be in line with the decision table. Unless the company has a secret 'No Fuel Expenses for Employees' policy, of course.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanda

6 months ago

This decision table is a work of art! I bet the person who made it has a PhD in Fuel Expense Management. Very thorough and precise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

6 months ago

I'm not sure about Test Case 1. Shouldn't the company at least allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount? Seems a bit harsh to completely disallow it.

upvoted 0 times

Venita

5 months ago

Yeah, it would be more fair to allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jestine

5 months ago

I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. Maybe the company should reconsider their policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

5 months ago

Test Case 2 is valid because the employee drives a 1700cc diesel car, which falls under band C for expense claims.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammy

5 months ago

I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. But that's how the decision table is structured.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonard

6 months ago

Test Case 1 seems too strict. Maybe they should allow a partial claim instead of none at all.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delfina

6 months ago

Test Case 1 is invalid because the company does not allow any fuel expense claim for employees who are not car or motorcycle drivers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharan

6 months ago

Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.

upvoted 0 times

Ocie

5 months ago

Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristal

6 months ago

I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlesetta

6 months ago

Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept expenses for a diesel car.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freida

6 months ago

I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patti

6 months ago

I agree, Test Case 2 is valid because it falls under band C in the decision table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dusti

6 months ago

Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.

upvoted 0 times

...