Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-1302 Topic 2 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-1302 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 2
[All JN0-1302 Questions]

You are performing a risk assessment on your new data center. You must determine the annual loss expectancy.

Which two calculations must you use in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Daniel
6 months ago
Definitely, the asset value is crucial to determining the annual loss expectancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
6 months ago
I believe we also need to consider the asset value in our risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
6 months ago
Yes, I agree. That's one of the calculations we must use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
7 months ago
I think we need to use single loss expectancy for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
7 months ago
I think annual rate of occurrence is also important to determine the annual loss expectancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
7 months ago
I believe we should also consider asset value for the second calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
7 months ago
I agree with single loss expectancy is crucial in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
7 months ago
I think we should use single loss expectancy for one calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. I think we need to consider the annual rate of occurrence as well. Shouldn't we be looking at the likelihood of the risk happening in addition to the potential impact?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
8 months ago
No kidding, I'm already feeling the stress just looking at this question. Let's see, we need to choose two out of those four options. I'm going to guess B and D, since those seem the most directly related to calculating the loss expectancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
8 months ago
Haha, good one! But yeah, I'm with you. Those two calculations seem like the most logical choices. I'm just hoping I can remember the formulas under pressure. Anyone else feeling like they need to do a little more last-minute cramming?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
8 months ago
Exposure factor? More like 'exposure panic'! Am I right, guys? *laughs* But seriously, I think you're on the right track. Single loss expectancy and annual rate of occurrence are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
8 months ago
I agree with you there. And asset value is obviously important too, since it's the potential impact of a loss. Though I have to say, exposure factor sounds a bit like a wild card to me. I'm not as confident about that one.
upvoted 0 times
Ruthann
6 months ago
I'm not completely sure about using exposure factor in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
7 months ago
Asset value is crucial too, it shows the potential impact of a loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
7 months ago
Yes, that's important to determine the overall risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
7 months ago
I think we definitely need to use single loss expectancy calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamela
8 months ago
Whoa, this annual loss expectancy calculation sounds like a real doozy! I hope the exam doesn't have too many of these brain-busters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
8 months ago
Alright, let's think this through step-by-step. Single loss expectancy and annual rate of occurrence are definitely key components of the annual loss expectancy calculation, so those are my top picks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
8 months ago
Yeah, me too. I mean, we've been studying this stuff for weeks, but you never know what kind of curveball the exam is going to throw at us. I'm just hoping I can remember all the formulas and definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
8 months ago
Ah, the classic annual loss expectancy question! This is definitely a tricky one. I'm feeling a bit nervous, to be honest. The options seem pretty straightforward, but I want to make sure I really understand the concepts before I answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77