Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-1362 Topic 3 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-1362 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-1362 Questions]

You are designing a Metro Ethernet ring topology that requires a sub 50 ms failover.

Which two protocols will meet this requirement? (Choose two )

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lavelle
5 months ago
Yes, Ethernet ring protection switching can provide rapid protection in case of link failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
5 months ago
I believe Ethernet ring protection switching is also a good option for sub 50 ms failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
6 months ago
I agree, MPLS fast reroute can provide fast failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
6 months ago
I think MPLS fast reroute could meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
6 months ago
So, our best options are Ethernet ring protection switching, MPLS fast reroute, and possibly Link Aggregation Control Protocol for the Metro Ethernet ring topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
6 months ago
Link Aggregation Control Protocol can also help increase bandwidth and provide failover in case of link failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
6 months ago
I would go with Ethernet ring protection switching and MPLS fast reroute for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
7 months ago
I think MPLS fast reroute could also be a good choice for sub 50 ms failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
7 months ago
I agree. Spanning Tree Protocol and Ethernet ring protection switching seem like good options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
7 months ago
I think we need protocols that can provide fast failover in a Metro Ethernet ring topology.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77