Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-1362 Topic 4 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-1362 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-1362 Questions]

You work for a service provider that currently uses a full mesh of IBGP peers to share EBGP routes. You are concerned about future scalability with this model and have decided to use route reflectors to overcome the scale limitations associated with the full mesh model.

In this scenario, which statement is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Teresita
6 months ago
I don't think we need to configure private autonomous system numbers on all IBGP peers, so option C doesn't seem right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
6 months ago
I believe Karon is right, option A is also a valid statement in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
6 months ago
But what about option A? Doesn't route reflectors actually readvertise both the active and backup routes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
7 months ago
I agree with German, option D seems like the correct choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
7 months ago
I think option D is true because route reflectors do not change existing IBGP next hops by default.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77