Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-231 Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-231 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-231 Questions]

An application firewall processes the first packet in a session for which the application has not yet been identified.

In this scenario, which action does the application firewall take on the packet?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

This is necessary to ensure that the application firewall can properly identify the application and the correct security policies can be applied before allowing any traffic to pass through.

If the first packet was allowed to pass without first being identified, then the application firewall would not know which security policies to apply - and this could potentially lead to security vulnerabilities or breaches. So it's important that the first packet is held until the application is identified.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Mitsue
6 months ago
This exam question is making me hungry. I could really go for a nice firewall sandwich right about now. Anyway, I think D is the right call here.
upvoted 0 times
Phuong
5 months ago
Definitely, it's important for security reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
Yeah, holding the first packet until the application is identified makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
5 months ago
I agree, D seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andra
6 months ago
Hah, the firewall's gotta be like, 'Nah, not today buddy!' and just deny that first packet. C is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Annita
5 months ago
D) It holds the first packet until the application is identified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
5 months ago
C) It denies the first packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
6 months ago
Hah, the firewall's gotta be like, 'Nah, not today buddy!' and just deny that first packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isabella
6 months ago
I dunno, man. Letting the first packet through just seems like a recipe for disaster. I'm gonna have to go with B on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
6 months ago
I agree with Genevieve, it makes sense to deny the first packet until the application is identified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
6 months ago
I think the application firewall would deny the first packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
6 months ago
I'm gonna go with D. Holding the first packet until the application is identified seems like the safest option to me. Can't be too careful with that first packet!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
6 months ago
I think the answer is B. The firewall should deny the first packet and send an error message to the user, that way it can analyze the traffic and identify the application before allowing any further packets.
upvoted 0 times
Phyliss
5 months ago
I agree, the firewall should deny the first packet and send an error message to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
6 months ago
That way it can analyze the traffic and identify the application before allowing any further packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
6 months ago
I agree, the firewall should deny the first packet and send an error message to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
6 months ago
The firewall should deny the first packet and send an error message to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
6 months ago
I agree, the firewall should deny the first packet and send an error message to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
6 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
6 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
6 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77