Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-280 Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-280 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-280 Questions]

You are creating an IP fabric underlay and want to use OSPF as your routing protocol.

In this scenario, which statement is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When creating an IP fabric underlay using OSPF as the routing protocol, consistent interface speeds are important to ensure optimal traffic distribution and utilization of all links.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

OSPF and Interface Speeds:

OSPF calculates the cost of a link based on its bandwidth. The default cost calculation in OSPF is:

If interface speeds vary significantly, OSPF may choose paths with lower cost (higher bandwidth), resulting in some links being underutilized.

Equal Utilization:

To ensure that all links are equally utilized in an IP fabric, it is recommended to maintain uniform interface speeds across the fabric. This ensures balanced load sharing across all available paths.

Juniper Reference:

IP Fabric with OSPF: Juniper recommends consistent interface speeds to maintain even traffic distribution and optimal link utilization in IP fabric underlay designs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cecily
22 days ago
Seriously, who comes up with these trick questions? I'm just going to go with my gut and choose C. Uniform interface speeds seem like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Son
4 days ago
Actually, in this scenario, all spine devices must use the same router ID. So D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
7 days ago
I think C is the correct answer. Uniform interface speeds make sense for optimal utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
25 days ago
This is a tricky one, but I'd say the correct answer is D. Having the same router ID for all spine devices is crucial for OSPF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
28 days ago
I'm going with option A. Separating the leaf devices into different areas makes the most sense for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
22 hours ago
I agree, having all leaf devices in separate OSPF areas can improve network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
7 days ago
Option A is a good choice. It helps with scalability by separating the leaf devices into different areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Belen
1 months ago
Haha, option B is a joke, right? Like, who would really think you need the same device models for load-balancing in OSPF?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 months ago
Option C sounds good to me. Matching interface speeds will ensure optimal load-balancing in the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
Remona
8 days ago
Yes, matching interface speeds will definitely help with efficient utilization of all links in the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
9 days ago
It's important to have consistent speeds to prevent any bottlenecks in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
12 days ago
I agree, having the same interface speeds will help distribute traffic evenly across the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
1 months ago
Option C sounds good to me. Matching interface speeds will ensure optimal load-balancing in the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desirae
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct statement is D) All spine devices must use the same router ID. This ensures consistency in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
2 months ago
I think the correct statement is A) All leaf devices must be configured in separate OSPF areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 months ago
I think option D is correct. All spine devices should use the same router ID for OSPF to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
Mi
19 days ago
C) Interface speeds should be the same throughout the fabric to ensure that all links are utilized.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
20 days ago
B) All leaf and spine devices must be the same model to ensure the proper load-balancing behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
29 days ago
A) All leaf devices must be configured in separate OSPF areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77