Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-351 Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-351 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-351 Questions]

Which two statements about redundant trunk groups on EX Series switches are correct? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Redundant Trunk Groups (RTGs) on EX Series switches provide a simple solution for network recovery when a trunk port on a switch goes down1.They are configured on the access switch and contain two links: a primary or active link, and a secondary link1.Therefore, option B is correct because if the active link fails, the secondary link automatically starts forwarding data traffic without waiting for normal spanning-tree protocol convergence1.

Option D is also correct.In a typical enterprise network composed of distribution and access layers, RTGs are used where one Access switch is connected to two different uplink switches2.This implies that RTGs must be connected to the same aggregation switch2.


by Jackie at Sep 15, 2024, 08:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-351 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Annette
2 months ago
Redundant trunk groups, huh? Sounds like a fancy way of saying 'backup cables'. As long as it works, that's all that matters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
2 months ago
C? Layer 2 control traffic on the secondary link? That's a bit odd. I'm not so sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
Colette
1 months ago
C) Layer 2 control traffic is permitted on the secondary link
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
1 months ago
B) If the active link fails, then the secondary link automatically takes over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 months ago
A) Redundant trunk groups load-balance traffic across two designated uplink interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozelle
2 months ago
I'm not sure about C and D. Can someone explain why they might not be correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
3 months ago
I agree with you, Stevie. A and B make sense because they ensure traffic is balanced and failover is automatic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
3 months ago
D is definitely true. Gotta have the redundant links connected to the same switch for it to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
3 months ago
I think A and B are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
3 months ago
A and B sound about right. Load-balancing and failover - that's what I'd expect from redundant trunk groups.
upvoted 0 times
Regenia
2 months ago
B) If the active link fails, then the secondary link automatically takes over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
2 months ago
A and B sound about right. Load-balancing and failover - that's what I'd expect from redundant trunk groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
2 months ago
A) Redundant trunk groups load-balance traffic across two designated uplink interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 months ago
B) If the active link fails, then the secondary link automatically takes over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
3 months ago
A) Redundant trunk groups load-balance traffic across two designated uplink interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77