Juniper Exam JN0-363 Topic 1 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam

Question #: 34
Topic #: 1

[All JN0-363 Questions]

When would you use the qualified-next-hop statement with a static route?

AYou can use it to install the static route into different routing tables.

BYou can use it to send unwanted traffic to a null route.

CYou can use it to specify multiple next hops with different preferences.

DYou can use it to resolve the next hop if the next hop is not directly connected.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/13684-12.html#anc13

Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State The problem occurs most frequently when you attempt to run OSPF between a Cisco router and another vendor router. The problem occurs when the maximum transmission unit (MTU) settings for neighboring router interfaces do not match. If the router with the higher MTU sends a packet larger that the MTU set on the neighboring router, the neighbor router ignores the packet. When this problem occurs, the output of the show ip ospf neighbor command displays output similar to what is shown in this figure.

by Hubert at Jun 01, 2024, 06:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-363 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tamera

29 days ago

Option A sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if that's the intended use of the qualified-next-hop. I think I'll go with option C - it seems the most practical and straightforward application of the statement.

upvoted 0 times

Sharan

13 days ago

I agree, option C is a common use case for the qualified-next-hop statement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslie

1 months ago

I'm confident option D is the correct answer. The qualified-next-hop helps resolve the next hop when it's not directly connected, which is a common scenario in complex networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wava

1 months ago

Ha! Option B made me chuckle. Sending traffic to a null route? That's like throwing your router out the window and hoping it lands on the right next-hop. I'm going with option C as well.

upvoted 0 times

Lanie

8 days ago

User 3: Yeah, option C is definitely the way to go for flexibility in routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharee

1 months ago

User 2: I agree! Option C seems like the most practical choice for specifying multiple next hops.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeniffer

1 months ago

User 1: Option B is hilarious! It's like a digital black hole for traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

1 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Sending unwanted traffic to a null route seems like a waste of resources. I'd go with option D - using the qualified-next-hop to resolve the next hop when it's not directly connected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

2 months ago

I think option C is the correct answer. The qualified-next-hop statement allows you to specify multiple next hops with different preferences, which can be useful for load-balancing or failover scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

Hester

17 days ago

I think it's important to understand the different uses of the qualified-next-hop statement in routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carli

25 days ago

That's true, using the qualified-next-hop statement with a static route can be helpful for load-balancing or failover.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizette

1 months ago

I agree, option C is the correct answer. It allows for specifying multiple next hops with different preferences.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abraham

2 months ago

I believe you can also use it to resolve the next hop if the next hop is not directly connected. It helps in routing the traffic efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kara

2 months ago

I agree with Cordell. It allows you to have more control over the traffic flow by specifying different preferences for the next hops.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordell

2 months ago

I think you would use the qualified-next-hop statement with a static route to specify multiple next hops with different preferences.

upvoted 0 times

...