Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-363 Topic 10 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 10
[All JN0-363 Questions]

You are implementing traffic engineering in your MPLS network. You must ensure that the MPLS routes are used to traverse your network. Your solution should not affect IGP routes in your route tables.

In this scenario, which traffic engineering setting will accomplish this behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

bgp---On BGP destinations only. Ingress routes are installed in the inet.3 routing table.

bgp-igp---On both BGP and IGP destinations. Ingress routes are installed in the inet.0 routing table. If IGP shortcuts are enabled, the shortcut routes are automatically installed in the inet.0 routing table.

bgp-igp-both-ribs---On both BGP and IGP destinations. Ingress routes are installed in the inet.0 and inet.3 routing tables. This option is used to support VPNs.

mpls-forwarding---On both BGP and IGP destinations. Use ingress routes for forwarding only, not for routing.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Mariann
2 months ago
D) bgp? Are you kidding me? That's like trying to navigate a maze with a blindfold on. I'm sticking with C) bgp-igp, it's the traffic engineering equivalent of a Swiss Army knife.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question: which traffic engineering setting will make my MPLS routes the boss of my network? I'm gonna have to go with C) bgp-igp. It's like the creme de la creme of traffic engineering, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
25 days ago
User 3: I agree, bgp-igp is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that setting ensures the MPLS routes are used without affecting IGP routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
1 months ago
I think C) bgp-igp is the way to go for MPLS traffic engineering.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
2 months ago
A) bgp-igp-both-ribs? Really? That's like trying to drive a car using both the steering wheel and the passenger-side door. I'm going with C) bgp-igp, it just makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. B) mpls-forwarding sounds like it could be the right answer. I mean, if you want to ensure MPLS routes are used, that seems like the way to go. Although, I'm kinda curious if the question is a trick and the answer is actually D) bgp.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
C'mon, this is easy! It's clearly C) bgp-igp. Why would you even consider the other options? That's like trying to catch a fish with a net made of cheese.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
1 months ago
Definitely, no need to complicate things with the other choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
1 months ago
Yeah, that's the best option for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
2 months ago
I agree, C) bgp-igp is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jolene
3 months ago
That makes sense, but I still think A) bgp-igp-both-ribs is the best option to ensure both BGP and IGP routes are used without affecting IGP routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
3 months ago
I think the correct setting is A) bgp-igp-both-ribs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) mpls-forwarding because it specifically focuses on MPLS routes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77