Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-480 Topic 6 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-480 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-480 Questions]

Exhibit.

Which two statements about ESI values are correct for the server connections to the fabric shown in the exhibit? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

To answer this question, we need to understand the concept of ESI values in EVPN LAGs. An ESI is a 10-byte value that identifies an Ethernet segment, which is a set of links that connect a multihomed device (such as a server) to one or more PE devices (such as leaf switches) in an EVPN network. The same ESI value must be configured on all the PE devices that connect to the same Ethernet segment. This allows the PE devices to form an EVPN LAG, which supports active-active or active-standby multihoming for the device. The ESI value can be manually configured (type 0) or automatically derived from LACP (type 1) or other methods. In the exhibit, Server A is connected to two leaf switches (QFX 5210) using a LAG with LACP enabled. Server B is connected to three leaf switches (QFX 5120) using a LAG with LACP enabled. Based on this information, the following statements are correct about ESI values for the server connections to the fabric:

C) A valid ESI value for Server A is 0x00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10. This is true because this ESI value can be automatically derived from the LACP configuration on the QFX 5210 devices. The LACP system ID is usually based on the MAC address of the device, and the LACP administrative key is a 2-byte value that identifies the LAG. For example, if the MAC address of the QFX 5210 device is 00:10:10:10:10:10 and the LAG ID is 10, then the LACP system ID is 00:10:10:10:10:10 and the LACP administrative key is 00:0A. The ESI value is then derived by concatenating the LACP system ID and the LACP administrative key, resulting in 00:10:10:10:10:10:00:0A. This ESI value can be represented in hexadecimal notation as 0x00.10.10.10.10.10.00.0A, or padded with zeros as 0x00.10.10.10.10.10.00.0A.00.00. This ESI value must be configured on both QFX 5210 devices that connect to Server A.

D) A valid ESI value for Server B is 0x00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00. This is true because this ESI value is a reserved value that indicates a single-homed device. Server B is connected to three leaf switches (QFX 5120) using a LAG, but it is not multihomed to any of them. This means that Server B does not need an ESI value to form an EVPN LAG with any of the leaf switches. Instead, Server B can use the reserved ESI value of 0x00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00, which indicates that it is a single-homed device and does not participate in any EVPN LAG. This ESI value must be configured on all three QFX 5120 devices that connect to Server B. The following statements are incorrect about ESI values for the server connections to the fabric:

A) A valid ESI value for Server A is 0x00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00. This is false because this ESI value is a reserved value that indicates a single-homed device. Server A is connected to two leaf switches (QFX 5210) using a LAG with LACP enabled, which means that it is multihomed to both of them. This means that Server A needs an ESI value to form an EVPN LAG with the leaf switches. The ESI value must be unique and non-zero for each Ethernet segment, so the reserved ESI value of 0x00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00 is not valid for Server A.

B) A valid ESI value for Server B is 0x00.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20. This is false because this ESI value is not derived from the LACP configuration on the QFX 5120 devices. Server B is connected to three leaf switches (QFX 5120) using a LAG with LACP enabled, but it is not multihomed to any of them. This means that Server B does not need an ESI value to form an EVPN LAG with any of the leaf switches. Instead, Server B can use the reserved ESI value of 0x00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00, which indicates that it is a single-homed device and does not participate in any EVPN LAG. The ESI value of 0x00.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20 is not valid for Server B, and it may cause conflicts with other Ethernet segments that use the same ESI value.Reference:

Ethernet Segment Identifiers, ESI Types, and LACP in EVPN LAGs

Understanding Automatically Generated ESIs in EVPN Networks

Ethernet Segment in EVPN: All You Need to Know


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kris
2 months ago
But the ESI values for Server A and Server B are different in the exhibit, so I think A and C make more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
2 months ago
I wonder if the exam writers have ever tried to remember a 20-digit hexadecimal number. That's gotta be a tough task!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
2 months ago
Wait, are we supposed to know the difference between valid and invalid ESI values? This is getting too technical for me.
upvoted 0 times
Youlanda
1 months ago
Yeah, that's correct. The ESI values help identify the servers in the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
1 months ago
I think I get it now. A valid ESI value for Server B is 0x00.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
1 months ago
A valid ESI value for Server A is 0x00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 months ago
It's important to understand the ESI values for server connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maricela
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B and D are the correct ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
3 months ago
Hmm, I thought ESI values were supposed to be unique, not all the same. That's a bit sus.
upvoted 0 times
Magnolia
2 months ago
Phyliss: That makes sense, so maybe options A and B are incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
2 months ago
Yeah, it does seem odd that the ESI values are all the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
2 months ago
I think option C and D are correct, they have different ESI values for Server A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
2 months ago
Maybe there's a mistake in the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hannah
3 months ago
The correct answers are B and C. A and D are invalid ESI values for the servers.
upvoted 0 times
Marci
2 months ago
Yes, A and D are invalid ESI values for the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
3 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
3 months ago
I think option A and C are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77