Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-636 Topic 6 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-636 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-636 Questions]

You are required to secure a network against malware. You must ensure that in the event that a

compromised host is identified within the network. In this scenario after a threat has been

identified, which two components are responsible for enforcing MAC-level infected host ?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

You are required to secure a network against malware. You must ensure that in the event that a compromised host is identified within the network, the host is isolated from the rest of the network. In this scenario, after a threat has been identified, the two components that are responsible for enforcing MAC-level infected host are:

C) Policy Enforcer. Policy Enforcer is a software solution that integrates with Juniper ATP Cloud and Juniper ATP Appliance to provide automated threat remediation across the network. Policy Enforcer can receive threat intelligence feeds from Juniper ATP Cloud or Juniper ATP Appliance and apply them to the security policies on the SRX Series devices and the EX Series devices. Policy Enforcer can also enforce MAC-level infected host, which is a feature that allows you to quarantine a compromised host by blocking its MAC address on the switch port.Policy Enforcer can communicate with the EX Series devices and instruct them to apply the MAC-level infected host policy to the infected host1.

D) EX Series device. EX Series devices are Ethernet switches that can provide Layer 2 and Layer 3 switching capabilities and security features. EX Series devices can integrate with Policy Enforcer and Juniper ATP Cloud or Juniper ATP Appliance to provide automated threat remediation across the network. EX Series devices can support MAC-level infected host, which is a feature that allows them to quarantine a compromised host by blocking its MAC address on the switch port.EX Series devices can receive instructions from Policy Enforcer and apply the MAC-level infected host policy to the infected host2.

The other options are incorrect because:

A) SRX Series device. SRX Series devices are high-performance firewalls that can provide Layer 3 and Layer 4 security features and integrate with Juniper ATP Cloud or Juniper ATP Appliance to provide advanced threat prevention. SRX Series devices can receive threat intelligence feeds from Juniper ATP Cloud or Juniper ATP Appliance and apply them to the security policies.However, SRX Series devices cannot enforce MAC-level infected host, which is a feature that requires Layer 2 switching capabilities and is supported by EX Series devices3.

B) Juniper ATP Appliance. Juniper ATP Appliance is a hardware solution that provides advanced threat prevention by detecting and blocking malware, ransomware, and other cyberattacks. Juniper ATP Appliance can analyze the network traffic and identify the compromised hosts based on their behavior and communication patterns. Juniper ATP Appliance can also send threat intelligence feeds to Policy Enforcer and SRX Series devices to enable automated threat remediation across the network. However, Juniper ATP Appliance cannot enforce MAC-level infected host, which is a feature that requires Layer 2 switching capabilities and is supported by EX Series devices.


Policy Enforcer Overview

EX Series Switches Overview

SRX Series Services Gateways Overview

[Juniper ATP Appliance Overview]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elsa
4 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm going to go with B and C - the Juniper ATP Appliance and the Policy Enforcer. Gotta love that Juniper synergy, am I right? Although, I do wonder if the Policy Enforcer has a secret karaoke hobby on the side. You know, just to let off a little steam from all that enforcing.
upvoted 0 times
Colette
3 months ago
Tashia: Haha, that would be quite the sight to see!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
3 months ago
I wonder if the Policy Enforcer sings karaoke while enforcing policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
3 months ago
Definitely, those two components work together seamlessly to enforce MAC-level infected host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
4 months ago
I agree, the Juniper ATP Appliance and Policy Enforcer are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amalia
5 months ago
D? Really? The EX Series is an Ethernet switch, not a security appliance. I think the correct answers are B and C - the Juniper ATP Appliance and the Policy Enforcer. Although, I do wonder if the Policy Enforcer is secretly a sentient being who just wants to enforce its own rules. The plot thickens!
upvoted 0 times
Gilma
3 months ago
C) Policy Enforcer
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
3 months ago
B) Juniper ATP Appliance
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
3 months ago
A) SRX Series device
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
4 months ago
C) Policy Enforcer
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
4 months ago
B) Juniper ATP Appliance
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
4 months ago
A) SRX Series device
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edelmira
5 months ago
I think the correct answers are A) SRX Series device and C) Policy Enforcer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
5 months ago
I believe C) Policy Enforcer is also responsible for enforcing MAC-level infected host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
5 months ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'm leaning towards A and C - the SRX Series device for the firewall functionality, and the Policy Enforcer to coordinate the whole thing. Hopefully, no one's sleepwalking on the job when this goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
5 months ago
I'm going with B and C. The Juniper ATP Appliance can detect the threat, and the Policy Enforcer can take action to isolate the infected host. Gotta love that Juniper synergy!
upvoted 0 times
Dorsey
5 months ago
Yes, and the Policy Enforcer can quickly isolate the infected host to prevent further damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
5 months ago
I agree, the Juniper ATP Appliance is great for detecting threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Misty
5 months ago
I agree with Mistybye, SRX Series device is responsible for enforcing MAC-level infected host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) SRX Series device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
5 months ago
The Policy Enforcer and SRX Series device seem like the obvious choices here. You need a firewall to enforce the MAC-level access control, and the Policy Enforcer can help coordinate the response.
upvoted 0 times
Veta
5 months ago
C) Policy Enforcer
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
5 months ago
A) SRX Series device
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77