Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-664 Topic 4 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

Based on the configuration contents shown in the exhibit, which statement is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

BGP policy framework is a set of tools that allows you to control the flow of routing information and apply routing policies based on various criteria. BGP policy framework consists of several components, such as route maps, prefix lists, community lists, AS path lists, and route filters. Route maps are used to define routing policies by matching certain conditions and applying certain actions. Prefix lists are used to filter routes based on their prefixes. Community lists are used to filter routes based on their community attributes. AS path lists are used to filter routes based on their AS path attributes.Route filters are used to filter routes based on their prefix length or range3. In this question, we have a route map named ISP-A that has two clauses: clause 10 and clause 20. Clause 10 matches any route with a prefix length between 8 and 24 bits and sets the local preference to 200. Clause 20 matches any route with a prefix of 224.7.7.7/32 and rejects it. The route map is applied inbound on the BGP neighborship with ISP-A. Based on this configuration, the correct statement is that joins for group 224.7.7.7 are always rejected, regardless of the group count. This is because clause 20 explicitly denies any route with a prefix of 224.7.7.7/32, which corresponds to the multicast group 224.7.7.7.


by Benedict at Jul 04, 2024, 02:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Scott D
4 months ago
IGMPv2 interface. Source address will never match as wild card. Only reject groups that exceed the maximum group limit of 25. Answer is D. If was IGMPv3 interface, different.
upvoted 1 times
...
Malcom
5 months ago
Ah, the joys of IGMP snooping. At least the exhibit is clear enough to make a choice. I'm going with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
5 months ago
I think Charlene is right, the group count value is the key factor here. So, D) makes more sense to me
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
5 months ago
D seems like the way to go. Who needs to count groups when you can just reject everything? #LazyNetworkAdmin
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
3 months ago
True, finding a balance between security and functionality is key in network administration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
3 months ago
But what if there are legitimate groups that need to join? Maybe a balance is needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
3 months ago
I agree, rejecting everything seems like the lazy but effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
3 months ago
Lazy network admin for sure, but it gets the job done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
4 months ago
Yeah, rejecting everything for that group seems easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
4 months ago
I think D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
5 months ago
But the exhibit clearly shows the configuration, and it seems to support option A)
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are accepted if the group count is less than 25
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards C, but I'll double-check the details just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
4 months ago
I agree with you, D seems to be the correct option based on the configuration shown.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
4 months ago
I think it's D, the joins for group 224.7.7.7 are accepted if the group count is less than 25.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The configuration looks a bit complex, but I'll go with option D just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
6 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. The exhibit shows that joins for group 224.7.7.7 are accepted if the group count is less than 25.
upvoted 0 times
Dacia
5 months ago
That makes sense, option D seems to be the correct answer based on the configuration shown.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
5 months ago
I agree, the exhibit clearly shows that joins for group 224.7.7.7 are accepted if the group count is less than 25.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
6 months ago
I think the answer is A) Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are rejected if the source address is 192.168.100.10
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77