Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-682 Topic 6 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-682 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-682 Questions]

You are asked to configure your IP fabric with OSPF as the underlay routing protocol.

Which two statements are correct about this implementation? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elliot
4 months ago
Wait, does this mean I can't play OSPF bingo during the configuration? Darn, there goes my weekend plan.
upvoted 0 times
Sheridan
3 months ago
B) Each host-connected interface of the leaf node is included in the OSPF configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
3 months ago
A) Each host-connected interface of the leaf node is included as passive in the OSPF configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerry
4 months ago
Aha! This is a classic networking exam question. The answer is clearly A and D. Passive interfaces on the hosts, active on the spines. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question is a bit tricky. I'll go with C and D just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
3 months ago
I believe those should be included as passive in the OSPF configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
3 months ago
But what about the host-connected interfaces of the leaf node?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
4 months ago
I agree, including the spine-connected interfaces in OSPF configuration makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
4 months ago
I think C and D are the correct options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hoa
5 months ago
I think both options A and B have their merits depending on the specific network requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
I think B and D are the right choices. The spine-connected interfaces need to be part of the OSPF configuration, and the host-connected interfaces should also be included.
upvoted 0 times
Emiko
3 months ago
Configuring the leaf node with OSPF requires attention to detail to ensure all necessary interfaces are included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
3 months ago
Including both types of interfaces ensures that the IP fabric with OSPF as the underlay routing protocol functions properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
4 months ago
I agree, B and D are the correct choices. Both spine-connected and host-connected interfaces need to be included in the OSPF configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
4 months ago
Make sure to double-check the configuration to ensure all necessary interfaces are included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
4 months ago
Including both spine-connected and host-connected interfaces in the OSPF configuration is essential for proper routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
4 months ago
I agree, B and D are the correct choices for configuring OSPF in the IP fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissia
5 months ago
But including all interfaces can cause unnecessary traffic, so passive interfaces might be a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is correct because all interfaces should be included in OSPF for proper routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
5 months ago
Option A and D seem correct to me. The spine-connected interfaces should be included in OSPF, but the host-connected interfaces should be set as passive to avoid unnecessary route updates.
upvoted 0 times
Kasandra
4 months ago
Yes, and including the spine-connected interfaces in OSPF ensures proper routing in the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
4 months ago
That's correct. The host-connected interfaces should be passive to avoid route updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
D) Each spine-connected interface of the leaf node is included in the OSPF configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
4 months ago
A) Each host-connected interface of the leaf node is included as passive in the OSPF configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissia
5 months ago
I think option A is correct because passive interfaces do not participate in OSPF.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77