Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Linux Foundation Exam LFCA Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Linux Foundation's LFCA exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 1
[All LFCA Questions]

A team just developed a new feature on the company's main web application. An IT associate wants to test this new feature by making it available for only 10% of the users. If everything works without any problems for a week, the associate will then make it available for all users. Which release type should be used to achieve this goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marta
2 months ago
This is a tough one, but I'd probably go with Canary release. It's like dipping your toes in the water before jumping in, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
2 months ago
Beta release sounds about right to me. It's a great way to get real-world feedback before the full launch.
upvoted 0 times
Freida
23 days ago
Beta release sounds about right to me. It's a great way to get real-world feedback before the full launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
24 days ago
D) Beta release
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
25 days ago
C) Alpha release
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
26 days ago
B) Experimental release
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
1 months ago
A) Canary release
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Experimental release might be the way to go. Isn't that what they use for new features at big tech companies?
upvoted 0 times
Buck
29 days ago
D) Beta release
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
1 months ago
C) Alpha release
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
2 months ago
B) Experimental release
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
A) Canary release
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
2 months ago
I think Canary release is the best option because it allows for gradual rollout and monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Experimental release could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
3 months ago
I agree with Reynalda, Canary release makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
3 months ago
Canary release seems like the obvious choice here. It allows you to test the feature with a small subset of users before rolling it out to everyone.
upvoted 0 times
Jenelle
2 months ago
Canary release is definitely the way to go for this situation. It's a smart way to minimize risk before full deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
3 months ago
I agree, using a canary release is a good way to test the new feature with a small group of users first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reynalda
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Canary release.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77