Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Linux Foundation Exam LFCA Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Linux Foundation's LFCA exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All LFCA Questions]

An IT associate has a web application running on multiple servers, configured to scale based on CPU usage. The current configuration has a minimum size of 1 and a maximum size of 5 servers, designed to launch and spread the instances across 3 Availability Zones (AZ). During a low utilization period, an entire AZ went down, and the application experienced downtime. What can the IT associate do to increase the availability of the application?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lorenza
1 months ago
Wait, did the question say the AZ went down, or the IT associate? Either way, I hope they have a backup plan, like a cup of coffee and a good sense of humor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
1 months ago
Increasing the maximum to 6? That's overkill, unless we're planning to host the entire internet on this app.
upvoted 0 times
Cory
15 days ago
C) Decrease the AZs to 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
17 days ago
A) Increase the minimum to 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
19 days ago
B) Change to scale based on number of requests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elly
1 months ago
Decreasing the AZs to 2? That's risky, we might as well put all our eggs in one basket!
upvoted 0 times
Alonso
3 days ago
User 3: I agree, increasing the minimum would definitely help spread the load better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
4 days ago
User 2: That sounds like a good idea, it would help with availability during low utilization periods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
17 days ago
User 1: We should increase the minimum to 2 servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wendell
2 months ago
Scaling based on number of requests? Interesting, but what if the requests are low and the CPU usage is still high?
upvoted 0 times
Helene
20 days ago
D) Increase the maximum to 6
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
26 days ago
Increase the maximum to 6
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 months ago
B) Change to scale based on number of requests
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
1 months ago
Increase the minimum to 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 months ago
A) Increase the minimum to 2
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Taryn
2 months ago
Hmm, increasing the minimum to 2 seems like a good start. At least we'll have a fallback if one AZ goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 months ago
I think increasing the maximum to 6 servers would provide better redundancy in case of AZ failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe changing to scale based on number of requests would be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
2 months ago
I think increasing the minimum to 2 servers would help increase availability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77